Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 30, 2025

Using Three-color Single-molecule FRET to Study the Correlation of Protein Interactions
Published on: January 30, 2018
IoU Regression with H+L-Sampling for Accurate Detection Confidence
1Center for Applied Mathematics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Abstract:
It is a common paradigm in object detection frameworks that the samples in training and testing have consistent distributions for the two main tasks: Classification and bounding box regression. This paradigm is popular in sampling strategy for training an object detector due to its intuition and practicability. For the task of localization quality estimation, there exist two ways of sampling: The same sampling with the main tasks and the uniform sampling by manually augmenting the ground-truth. The first method of sampling is simple but inconsistent for the task of quality estimation. The second method of uniform sampling contains all IoU level distributions but is more complex and difficult for training. In this paper, we propose an H+L-Sampling strategy, selecting the high and low IoU samples simultaneously, to effectively and simply train the branch of quality estimation. This strategy inherits the effectiveness of consistent sampling and reduces the training difficulty of uniform sampling. Finally, we introduce accurate detection confidence, which combines the classification probability and the localization accuracy, as the ranking keyword of NMS. Extensive experiments show the effectiveness of our method in solving the misalignment between classification confidence and localization accuracy and improving the detection performance.
Related Concept Videos
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Confidence Intervals
A...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Confidence Coefficient
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...

