Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Magnetic Field Due To A Thin Straight Wire01:28

Magnetic Field Due To A Thin Straight Wire

5.5K
Consider an infinitely long straight wire carrying a current I. The magnetic field at point P at a distance a from the origin can be calculated using the Biot-Savart law.
5.5K
Magnetic Field Due to Two Straight Wires01:18

Magnetic Field Due to Two Straight Wires

3.5K
Consider two parallel straight wires carrying a current of 10 A and 20 A in the same direction and separated by a distance of 20 cm. Calculate the magnetic field at a point "P2", midway between the wires. Also, evaluate the magnetic field when the direction of the current is reversed in the second wire.
3.5K
Magnetic Susceptibility and Permeability01:31

Magnetic Susceptibility and Permeability

1.7K
In linear magnetic materials, like paramagnets and diamagnets, magnetization is proportional to the magnetic field intensity. The constant of proportionality, a dimensionless number, is called magnetic susceptibility. The value of the susceptibility depends on the type of material.
When diamagnetic materials are placed under an external magnetic field, the moments opposite to the field are induced. Hence, the susceptibility for diamagnets has a minimal negative value of 10-5–10-6. Since...
1.7K
Eddy Currents01:25

Eddy Currents

2.0K
Since eddy currents occur only in conductors, magnets can separate metals from other materials. For example, in a recycling center, trash is dumped in batches down a ramp, beneath which lies a powerful magnet. Conductors in the trash are slowed by eddy currents, while nonmetals in the trash move on, separating from the metals. This works for all metals, not just ferromagnetic ones.
Other major applications of eddy currents appear in metal detectors and the braking systems of trains and roller...
2.0K
Magnetic Damping01:17

Magnetic Damping

709
Eddy currents can produce significant drag on motion, called magnetic damping. For instance, when a metallic pendulum bob swings between the poles of a strong magnet, significant drag acts on the bob as it enters and leaves the field, quickly damping the motion.
If, however, the bob is a slotted metal plate, the magnet produces a much smaller effect. When a slotted metal plate enters the field, an emf is induced by the change in flux; however, it is less effective because the slots limit the...
709
Magnetic Force On Current-Carrying Wires: Example01:22

Magnetic Force On Current-Carrying Wires: Example

1.7K
In a magnetic field, moving charges encounter a force. If a wire contains these moving charges, i.e., if the wire is carrying a current, then a force acts on the wire as well. Consider a pair of flexible leads holding a wire that is 40 cm long and 10 g in weight in a horizontal position. The wire is placed in a constant magnetic field of 0.40 T, as shown in Figure 1(a). Determine the magnitude and direction of the current flowing in the wire needed to remove the tension in the supporting leads.
1.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Development of K-CORE: a web-based platform for integrated clinico-genomic analysis.

Life science alliance·2026
Same author

Normal Hearing Thresholds in Korean Adults Aged 20-79 Years: Establishing Reference Values and Comparison With International Organization for Standardization 7029:2017.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same author

Dehydroandrographolide attenuates Toll-like receptor signaling by dual inhibition of MyD88- and TRIF-dependent pathways.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Disorder suppression and tunable localization in ultrathin SrIrO<sub>3</sub> films via SrTiO<sub>3</sub> capping.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Leveraging Large Language Models for Thyroid Nodule Information Extraction and Matching Across Medical Reports.

AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium·2026
Same author

Quantitative Analysis of Biomarkers to Distinguish Between Korean and Chinese Mud Loaches.

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 30, 2025

Quantifying the Relative Thickness of Conductive Ferromagnetic Materials Using Detector Coil-Based Pulsed Eddy Current Sensors
06:17

Quantifying the Relative Thickness of Conductive Ferromagnetic Materials Using Detector Coil-Based Pulsed Eddy Current Sensors

Published on: January 16, 2020

5.9K

Neural Network for Metal Detection Based on Magnetic Impedance Sensor.

Sungjae Ha1, Dongwoo Lee2, Hoijun Kim2

  • 1Spatial Computing Convergence Center, Kwangwoon University, 20 Kwangwoon-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01897, Korea.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|July 2, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deep learning enhances metal detection using multiple magnetic impedance (MI) sensors. Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) generally outperform convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for this sensor-based detection technology.

Keywords:
convolutional neural networkdeep learningmagnetic impedancemetal detectionrecurrent neural networksensorsignal processing

More Related Videos

Frequency Mixing Magnetic Detection Scanner for Imaging Magnetic Particles in Planar Samples
07:01

Frequency Mixing Magnetic Detection Scanner for Imaging Magnetic Particles in Planar Samples

Published on: June 9, 2016

9.8K
Assessing the Influence of Personality on Sensitivity to Magnetic Fields in Zebrafish
07:47

Assessing the Influence of Personality on Sensitivity to Magnetic Fields in Zebrafish

Published on: March 18, 2019

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 30, 2025

Quantifying the Relative Thickness of Conductive Ferromagnetic Materials Using Detector Coil-Based Pulsed Eddy Current Sensors
06:17

Quantifying the Relative Thickness of Conductive Ferromagnetic Materials Using Detector Coil-Based Pulsed Eddy Current Sensors

Published on: January 16, 2020

5.9K
Frequency Mixing Magnetic Detection Scanner for Imaging Magnetic Particles in Planar Samples
07:01

Frequency Mixing Magnetic Detection Scanner for Imaging Magnetic Particles in Planar Samples

Published on: June 9, 2016

9.8K
Assessing the Influence of Personality on Sensitivity to Magnetic Fields in Zebrafish
07:47

Assessing the Influence of Personality on Sensitivity to Magnetic Fields in Zebrafish

Published on: March 18, 2019

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Sensor Technology
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Electromagnetism

Background:

  • Magnetic impedance (MI) sensors detect metal objects by sensing magnetic field changes.
  • Detecting metal objects with MI sensors is challenging due to small, noisy magnetic field variations, limiting detection distance.
  • Deep learning offers a potential solution to improve the sensitivity and range of MI-based metal detection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the efficiency of deep learning methods for metal detection using data from multiple MI sensors.
  • To compare the performance of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) in analyzing MI sensor data for metal detection.
  • To analyze the performance of a deep-learning-based (DLB) metal detection network incorporating multiple MI sensors, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and CNNs.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from multiple magnetic impedance (MI) sensors for metal detection.
  • Applied deep learning models, specifically Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), to analyze sensor data.
  • Compared the performance of CNN and RNN models, including variations in network depth and metal sheet size, using LSTM and CNN integration.

Main Results:

  • Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) demonstrated superior overall performance compared to Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) for metal detection using MI sensor data.
  • Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) showed better performance in the initial stages of detection compared to RNNs.
  • The deep-learning-based (DLB) network performance was analyzed based on the number of network layers and the size of the detected metal sheet.

Conclusions:

  • Deep learning, particularly RNNs, significantly improves metal detection capabilities with multiple MI sensors.
  • The study highlights the potential of combining different deep learning architectures like LSTM and CNN for enhanced sensor-based detection.
  • Findings are expected to advance sensor-based deep learning detection technologies for improved metal object identification.