Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Biomechanical effects of clear aligner with different shape design at extraction space area during anterior teeth retraction.

Orthodontics & craniofacial research·2024
Same author

Improving mental arithmetic ability of primary school students with schema teaching method: An experimental study.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Quantitative analysis of the morphing wing mechanism of raptors: Bionic design of Falco Peregrinus wing skeleton.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Two cases of driver death caused by airbag rupture.

Traffic injury prevention·2024
Same author

New insights into the genetic loci related to egg weight and age at first egg traits in broiler breeder.

Poultry science·2024
Same author

Publisher Correction: Nuclear export of circular RNA.

Nature·2024
Same journal

Smile frameworks defined by the patient's facial pattern: A cross-sectional study.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Evaluation of the correlation between dental arch width and dentofacial parameters using cone-beam computed tomography: A retrospective analysis.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Patient experiences with orthodontic retention and retainers: A scoping review.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2026
Same journal

We are there for you.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Considerations concerning credit cards.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2026
Same journal

Thieves of thought: Plagiarism in scientific writing.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 30, 2025

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.5K

Efficacy of Invisalign attachments: A retrospective study.

Theresa Karras1, Maharaj Singh2, Emelia Karkazis2

  • 1Formerly, Department of Orthodontics, Marquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, Wis; currently, Private practice, Chicago, Ill.

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics : Official Publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics
|July 4, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Optimized and conventional attachments show similar effectiveness for Invisalign rotations and extrusions. Clinicians should consider overcorrecting anterior tooth extrusion for better results.

More Related Videos

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.7K
Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
11:19

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants

Published on: June 24, 2018

11.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 30, 2025

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment
07:32

Author Spotlight: 3D Movement Assessment of Maxillary Posterior Teeth in Clear Aligner Treatment

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.5K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.7K
Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants
11:19

Oral Biofilm Formation on Different Materials for Dental Implants

Published on: June 24, 2018

11.8K

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Biomechanical Engineering
  • Dental Technology

Background:

  • Invisalign attachments are crucial for precise tooth movement.
  • Optimized attachments are designed to improve rotational and extrusive control.
  • Understanding attachment efficacy is key to successful orthodontic treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of Invisalign's optimized and conventional attachments.
  • To evaluate their impact on rotational and extrusive tooth movements.
  • To determine if optimized attachments offer superior control over conventional types.

Main Methods:

  • Digital dental models from 100 patients were analyzed using ClinCheck software.
  • Stereolithography files were imported into Slicer CMF for superimposition.
  • Rotational and extrusive movements were measured for 382 teeth, comparing predicted vs. achieved outcomes.

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant differences in accuracy between optimized and conventional attachments for rotation and extrusion.
  • Mean predicted movements exceeded achieved movements for all types (P < 0.0001).
  • Clinically significant differences in extrusion accuracy were noted (0.40mm optimized, 0.62mm conventional). Overall accuracy was 57.2% (63.2% rotation, 47.6% extrusion).

Conclusions:

  • Conventional attachments are as effective as optimized ones for canine/premolars rotations and incisor/canine extrusions.
  • Clinicians should consider overcorrecting tooth movements, particularly anterior extrusion.
  • Treatment planning may need adjustments to account for inherent movement inaccuracies.