Comparative study between patients undergoing laparoscopic colposacropexy with and without prior surgery for the...

Colposacropexy is the treatment of choice for apical prolapse. Studies comparing this technique as primary surgery for pelvic organprolapse (POP), with its success in recurrent POPs after surgery, are scarce.

Retrospective analysis of a series of patients diagnosed with POP who underwent laparoscopic colposacropexy, comparing a group without previous prolapse surgery with another group that has recurred after previous surgery (with or without mesh). Our objective was to analyze the differences regarding surgical time (skin to skin), intraoperative complications, mean stay, resolution of symptoms and recurrence. As preoperative data, we compared: age, body mass index (BMI), parity, previous hysterectomy, physical examination, symptoms, and flowmetry; and as peri/postoperative data: follow-up, intervention duration, intra and postoperative complications, mean stay, physical examination (Baden-Walker classification), symptom resolution and flowmetry.

Twenty-three patients have been operated on in 12 months. Nine (39.1%) were recurrent POPs after previous surgery, 6 (66.7%) of them with some type of mesh. Follow-up (mean months): 6.44 ± 4.19 (previous cx) vs. 4.79 ± 4.00. Both groups were comparable with respect to preoperative variables. Previously operated patients had greater dyspareunia (p<0.05). We did not find differences in the rest of symptoms between both groups. There were no differences in the duration of the intervention, mean stay, or regarding intraoperative complications (p>0.05) between both groups. Sensation of vaginal lump, urge incontinence and dyspareunia resolved in all patients. Flowmetry improved in both groups (p>0.05).

Laparoscopic colposacropexy is an effective and safe technique to correct POP after previous surgery, with or without mesh.