Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2025

06:18
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
2.3K
Bifurcation in the evolution of certainty in a small decision-making group by consensus
Alexandra Gheondea-Eladi1, Aurelian Gheondea2,3
1Research Institute for Quality of Life, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania.
Summary
Certainty in group decisions bifurcates, with some participants oscillating and others not. This study refines the mathematical model to explain this bifurcation and its causes.
Area of Science:
- Decision-making processes
- Mathematical modeling
- Psychology of certainty
Background:
- Previous research indicated certainty oscillations in group decision-making for two-thirds of participants.
- A distinct split in participant behavior regarding certainty evolution was observed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the bifurcation in certainty evolution using a more accurate mathematical model.
- To determine the underlying meaning of this bifurcation and its amenability to analytical or numerical methods.
Main Methods:
- Refinement of the mathematical model for certainty evolution, making it explicit in terms of parameters.
- Analytical and computer simulation verification of the model's robustness to parameter variations.
- Curve-fitting of the refined model to existing experimental data from group decision-making.
Main Results:
- A refined mathematical model was developed, confirming the analytical and empirical existence of the bifurcation.
- The refined model demonstrated that initial conditions do not skew empirical results.
- The study identified potential interpretations for the observed behavioral split.
Conclusions:
- The bifurcation in certainty evolution during group consensus is analytically and empirically validated.
- Sensitivity to certainty's absolute value and rate of change are proposed as key interpretations.
- Further interpretations include orientation towards certainty/uncertainty and affect.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.5K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.5K
Decision Making: P-value Method
6.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.0K
Groupthink
46.8K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
46.8K
Decision Making
382
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
382
Confirmation Biases
7.4K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
7.4K
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility
3.4K
Electrocyclic reactions, cycloadditions, and sigmatropic rearrangements are concerted pericyclic reactions that proceed via a cyclic transition state. These reactions are stereospecific and regioselective. The stereochemistry of the products depends on the symmetry characteristics of the interacting orbitals and the reaction conditions. Accordingly, pericyclic reactions are classified as either symmetry-allowed or symmetry-forbidden. Woodward and Hoffmann presented the selection criteria for...
3.4K

