The effect on precision and T1 bias comparing two flip angles when estimating muscle fat infiltration using...

Investigation of the effect on accuracy and precision of different parameter settings is important for quantitative MRI. The purpose of this study was to investigate T1 bias and precision for muscle fat infiltration (MFI) measurements using fat-referenced chemical shift MFI measurements at flip angles of 5° and 10°. The fat-referenced measurements were compared with fat fractions, which is a more commonly used measure of MFI. This retrospective study was performed on data from a clinical intervention study including 40 postmenopausal women. Test and retest images were acquired with a 3-T scanner using four-point 3D spoiled gradient multiecho acquisition. Postprocessing included T2* correction and fat-referenced calibration, where the fat signal was calibrated using adipose tissue as reference. The mean MFI was calculated in six different muscle regions using both the fat-referenced fat signal and the fat fraction, defined as the fat signal divided by the sum of the fat and water signals. Both methods used the same fat and water images as input. The variance of the difference between mean MFI from test and retest was used as the measure of precision. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) characteristics were analyzed by measuring the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the fat signal distribution. There was no difference in the mean MFI at different flip angles for the fat-referenced technique (p = 0.66), while the measured fat fractions were 3.3 percentage points larger for 10° compared with 5° (p < 0.001). No significant difference in the precision was found in any of the muscles analyzed. However, the FWHM of the fat signal distribution was significantly (p = 0.01) lower at 10°. This strenghtens the hypothesis that fat-referenced MFI is insensitive to flip angle-induced T1 bias in CSE-MRI, enabling usage of a higher and more SNR-effective flip angle. The lower FWHM in fat-referenced MFI at 10° indicates that high flip angle acquisition is advantageous even although no significant differences in precision were observed comparing 5° and 10°.