Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
Published on: June 30, 2020
Comparing Biofeedback Types for Children With Residual /ɹ/ Errors in American English: A Single-Case Randomization
Nina R Benway1, Elaine R Hitchcock2, Tara McAllister3
1Department of Communication Sciences & Disorders, Syracuse University, NY.
This study compared ultrasound and visual-acoustic biofeedback for speech errors in children. While most showed similar progress, one child improved more with visual-acoustic feedback, suggesting personalized treatment potential.
Area of Science:
- Speech-Language Pathology
- Acoustic Analysis
- Childhood Speech Disorders
Background:
- Residual speech errors, particularly the American English rhotic /ɹ/, present challenges for effective treatment.
- Biofeedback modalities like ultrasound and visual-acoustic feedback offer potential for targeted speech therapy.
- Individualized treatment approaches are needed to address variability in response to speech interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of ultrasound biofeedback versus visual-acoustic biofeedback for improving /ɹ/ production in children.
- To investigate within-treatment response and generalization to untrained words for each biofeedback type.
- To explore individual predictors of treatment success, including age, auditory-perceptual skills, and oral somatosensory abilities.
Main Methods:
- A single-case experimental design was employed with seven children (ages 9-16) with residual /ɹ/ errors.
- Each participant received 10 treatment visits, alternating between 45 minutes of ultrasound and 45 minutes of visual-acoustic biofeedback.
- Acoustic measurements (normalized F3-F2 difference) assessed /ɹ/ acquisition and generalization; perceptual ratings were also used for generalization probes.
Main Results:
- Five participants acquired the target /ɹ/ sound in practiced words.
- Three participants showed clinically significant generalization to untrained words.
- One participant demonstrated a notable advantage in /ɹ/ improvement with visual-acoustic biofeedback compared to ultrasound.
Conclusions:
- While most participants did not show a significant difference between biofeedback types, findings suggest potential for individualized treatment selection.
- Auditory-perceptual acuity emerged as a possible factor influencing generalization of /ɹ/ production.
- Further research is warranted to optimize biofeedback interventions for residual speech sound disorders.
Related Concept Videos
Group Design
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

