Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
Published on: August 9, 2024
Measuring research capacity development in healthcare workers: a systematic review
Davide Bilardi1,2, Elizabeth Rapa3, Sarah Bernays4,5
1Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Oxford, UK davide.bilardi@gtc.ox.ac.uk.
Measuring healthcare workers' research capacity is vital. This systematic review identifies tools for assessing individual research competencies, highlighting a need for standardized global measurement instruments for health research capacity development (HRCD).
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Medical Education
- Research Capacity Development
Background:
- A significant barrier to advancing health research capacity development (HRCD) is the absence of empirical methods to measure competencies and identify skill gaps.
- Effective tools are needed to assess individual healthcare workers' research skills, informing targeted interventions and promoting locally led research initiatives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically identify and review existing tools designed to measure individual healthcare workers' capacities for conducting research.
- To inform the development of effective strategies for health research capacity development.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and narrative synthesis was conducted, adhering to PRISMA guidelines.
- Searches were performed across 11 databases and Google Scholar, including English-language publications from inception to January 2020.
- Studies employing qualitative, mixed, or quantitative methods to assess individual-level HRCD in healthcare workers were included.
Main Results:
- 16 papers were selected, detailing various tools for measuring HRCD in healthcare workers at the individual level.
- The 'Research Capacity and Culture' tool and 'Research Spider' tool were frequently identified.
- Most tools assessed individual capacity, with many also measuring team/organizational levels or perceived barriers/motivators.
Conclusions:
- Current capacity building often relies on generic pre/post-intervention evaluations, lacking specific measurement tools.
- There is a critical need to differentiate between measuring training outcomes and promoting genuine HRCD.
- The review underscores a lack of globally applicable, standardized tools for consistent measurement of research competencies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
Current Trends in Nursing I
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Current Trends in Nursing II

