Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.5K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.5K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

382
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
382
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.0K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.1K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.1K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

92.9K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
92.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative analysis of gene expression in mammalian claustrum subdivisions.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

A hypothalamic VMPO-supraoptic vasopressin circuit mediates procalcitonin-induced fluid imbalance.

Cell reports·2026
Same author

Post-market surveillance of gelatin-thrombin hemostats in neurosurgery: a 10-year MAUDE Analysis.

Neurological research·2026
Same author

GLP-1 Agonists in Orthopedic Surgery: A Narrative Review of Bone Health and Surgical Implications.

HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery·2026
Same author

Response to the letter to the editor: Interpreting meta-analyses of biportal endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Asian spine journal·2026
Same author

Dynamic Reconfiguration of Brain Functional Networks Following Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as an Add-On Treatment in Stroke.

Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society·2026
Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

An introduction to the special issue celebrating Mary A. Peterson.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Dissociations between stereoacuity and visual acuity with binocular night vision goggles.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Reward-based prioritization and perceptual feature effects on attentional flexibility in working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.6K

Deciphering human decision rules in motion discrimination.

Jinfeng Huang1,2,3, Alexander Yu4, Yifeng Zhou2,3

  • 1Department of Psychology, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|July 9, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers tested decision rules for same-different tasks. Human data from a motion discrimination experiment rejected four rules and confirmed that only the two-criteria differencing rule (DF2) accurately models human performance.

Keywords:
Motion discriminationROCSame-differentSignal detection theory

More Related Videos

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice
08:35

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

12.4K
An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

13.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
07:34

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues

Published on: June 3, 2013

17.6K
An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice
08:35

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

12.4K
An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

13.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Decision making
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Signal detection theory provides a framework for understanding decision-making under uncertainty.
  • Several decision rules exist within this framework, each with different assumptions about how evidence is processed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate eight decision rules from signal detection theory for a same-different task.
  • To determine which decision rule best explains human performance in a motion discrimination task.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of decision rules, including the differencing (DF) rule and optimal independence rule.
  • A same-different rating experiment involving motion discrimination with varying directional differences.
  • Fitting human data to decision rules using residual distribution analysis in a four-dimensional space.

Main Results:

  • Four decision rules were rejected because human data violated their constraints on false alarm rates.
  • Human data did not support the independence rule, as indicated by the Z-ROC slope.
  • Only the two-criteria differencing rule (DF2) successfully accounted for the observed human data.

Conclusions:

  • The standard model of signal detection theory can be used to model human decision-making.
  • The two-criteria differencing rule (DF2) provides the most accurate account of human performance in the tested same-different motion discrimination task.