Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2025

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Broadening the toolset for stakeholder engagement to explore consensus over wolf management
Agnese Marino1, Paolo Ciucci2, Stephen M Redpath3
1Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regents Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK.
A participatory approach using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) helped resolve social tensions over wolf presence in Italy. This method fostered dialogue and agreement on coexistence strategies between stakeholders, aiding large carnivore conservation efforts.
Area of Science:
- Conservation Biology
- Human-Wildlife Conflict Resolution
- Environmental Management
Background:
- Large carnivore conservation in human-dominated landscapes faces challenges due to negative impacts on human interests.
- Recent wolf recovery in central Italy has led to social tensions and a stalemate in management strategies.
- Previous top-down mitigation policies, like damage compensation, have proven ineffective.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test a participatory approach engaging diverse stakeholder groups in dialogue to co-create solutions for wolf management.
- To explore the application of the meta-consensus theory and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) in resolving human-carnivore conflict.
- To foster understanding and agreement on coexistence strategies in an area with recent wolf recolonization.
Main Methods:
- A 3-month participatory process involving five workshops with representatives from farming, hunting, environmental associations, and a biologist.
- Utilized Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) as a decision support tool to facilitate dialogue and consensus-building.
- Focused on sharing understanding of the problem and co-creating potential management solutions.
Main Results:
- Stakeholders identified shared objectives and agreed on management interventions, including managing free-ranging dogs and implementing damage prevention and compensation systems.
- The process improved stakeholder relations and enhanced knowledge on wolf-related issues.
- Positive social outcomes and a willingness for further discussion on management preferences were observed.
Conclusions:
- Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is a valuable tool for initiating participatory and deliberative processes in wolf management.
- The participatory approach successfully laid groundwork for coexistence strategies, despite challenges with participant numbers and methodology complexity.
- Further efforts are needed to involve broader representation and simplify the decision-making tools for wider applicability.
More Related Videos
11:53Spatial Multiobjective Optimization of Agricultural Conservation Practices using a SWAT Model and an Evolutionary Algorithm
Published on: December 9, 2012
09:09Protocol for Assessing the Relative Effects of Environment and Genetics on Antler and Body Growth for a Long-lived Cervid
Published on: August 8, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Threats to Biodiversity
Conservation of Small Populations
What is Conservation Biology?
Multi-species Conserved Sequences
Although the genome of each species varies greatly from each other, a few sequences are highly conserved. Such conserved...
Keystone Species
Competition