Related Experiment Videos
Modification of impulsive tempo in learning-disabled pupils
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
|December 1, 1977
Summary
Modeling and self-verbalization techniques improved problem-solving for impulsive, learning-disabled boys immediately. However, these cognitive strategies did not show lasting effects on the delayed test.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Educational Psychology
Background:
- Impulsive behavior and learning disabilities often co-occur in children.
- Effective cognitive strategies are crucial for improving problem-solving skills in this population.
- Previous research explored various interventions for impulsivity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effectiveness of modeling and self-verbalization techniques on the problem-solving skills of impulsive, learning-disabled males.
- To compare the immediate and delayed effects of these interventions.
Main Methods:
- Thirty-three impulsive learning-disabled males (aged 9-12) were divided into three groups: Modeling, Modeling Plus Self-Verbalization, and Control.
- Participants were assessed using the Matching Familiar Figures test immediately after treatment and again after a 3-week delay.
Main Results:
- Both Modeling and Modeling Plus Self-Verbalization significantly reduced errors on the immediate test compared to the Control group.
- No significant differences were observed among the groups on the delayed test.
- Response latency did not differ significantly across the treatment conditions.
Conclusions:
- Observational learning and self-instruction can provide immediate benefits for problem-solving in impulsive, learning-disabled children.
- The long-term efficacy of these interventions requires further investigation.
- Future research should explore factors influencing the generalization and maintenance of cognitive strategies.