Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2025

Utilization of Plasmonic and Photonic Crystal Nanostructures for Enhanced Micro- and Nanoparticle Manipulation
Published on: September 27, 2011
Photonic crystal light trapping for photocatalysis
Abstract:
The Achilles heel of wide-band photocatalysts such as TiO2 is the insufficient photogeneration in the visible range under sunlight. This has been a longstanding impediment to large-scale, real-world deployment of titania-based photocatalysis applications. Instead of traditional band engineering through heavy-doping, we suggest enhancing photocatalytic efficiency of lightly-doped TiO2 using photonic crystal (PC) structures. This strongly increases solar photogeneration through novel wave-interference-based light trapping. Four photocatalyst structures - simple cubic woodpile (wdp), square lattice nanorod (nrPC), slanted conical-pore (scPore), and face-centered cubic inverse opal (invop) - are optimized and compared for light harvesting in the sub- and above-gap (282 to 550 nm) regions of weakly absorbing TiO2, with the imaginary part of the dielectric constant 0.01 in the visible range. The optimized lattice constants for the first three, and opal center-to-center distance for invop, are ∼300 - 350 nm. For fixed PC thickness, the ranking of visible light harvesting capability is: scPore > wdp ∼ nrPC > invop. The scPore PC deposited on highly reflective substrate is ideal for photocatalysis given its combination of enhanced light trapping and superior charge transport.

