Timing of Flap Coverage With Respect to Definitive Fixation in Open Tibia Fractures.
Casey Kuripla1, Paul Tornetta1, Clary J Foote2
1Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
|July 16, 2021
Summary
Delays in definitive fixation and flap coverage for type III tibial fractures increase infection risk. Coordinating care with orthoplastic teams can reduce these nosocomial wound infections.
Area of Science:
- Orthopaedic trauma surgery
- Infectious disease epidemiology
- Microsurgery and reconstructive surgery
Background:
- Type III tibial fractures are severe injuries often requiring complex surgical management.
- Nosocomial wound infections are a significant complication, impacting patient outcomes and healthcare costs.
- The timing of soft-tissue coverage relative to fracture fixation is a potential modifiable factor in infection prevention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between delays in definitive fixation and flap coverage and the risk of nosocomial wound infection in patients with type III tibial fractures.
- To identify critical time intervals in the management of these complex fractures that influence infection rates.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 296 patients with Gustilo type III open tibial fractures requiring flap coverage from 14 U.S. trauma centers.
- Multivariate regression models were used to assess the impact of time from injury to coverage, debridement to coverage, and definitive fixation to coverage on infection risk.
- Patient demographics and surgical details were collected and analyzed.
Main Results:
- 32.4% of patients developed a wound infection.
- The time from definitive fixation to flap coverage was the most significant predictor of subsequent infection (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, P=0.02).
- Flap failure was strongly associated with infection (OR 6.83, 95% CI 3.26-14.27, P<0.001).
Conclusions:
- Optimizing the timing between definitive fixation and flap coverage is crucial for reducing infection rates in type III tibial fractures.
- Dedicated orthoplastic teams can improve care coordination and potentially lower infection rates.
- Early and coordinated management involving both fracture stabilization and soft-tissue reconstruction is key to successful outcomes.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Fractures: Bone Repair
4.1K
Treatment for a fracture is based on the type of break, the bone affected, and the patient's age.
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
Minor fractures with no bone displacement are treated by immobilizing the fractured bone using a cast or splint. However, in the case of fractures with displaced bones, the broken bones are repositioned before immobilization to ensure successful healing without deformation and loss of function. The realignment of fractured bone ends is performed through a process called reduction. If the...
4.1K
Flail Chest-II
304
Managing flail chest, a condition characterized by a segment of the chest wall moving independently from the rest of the thoracic cage, requires a comprehensive approach. It includes a thorough assessment of the patient's condition, a diagnostic evaluation to determine the extent of the injury, and the implementation of appropriate medical interventions tailored to the individual's needs.
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
304


