Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2025

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Coronary Artery Revascularization
Published on: September 15, 2023
[Different revascularization strategies for patients with coronary artery disease complicating reduced ejection
1Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China.
Insights
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a viable alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Long-term survival rates are comparable, suggesting PCI can be considered for patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) often coexists with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).
- Revascularization strategies aim to improve outcomes in these complex patients.
- Comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is crucial for optimizing treatment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the short- and long-term outcomes of CAD patients with HFrEF treated with PCI versus CABG.
- To evaluate the impact of revascularization strategy on left ventricular function and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 1,813 CAD patients with HFrEF who underwent successful PCI (n=687) or CABG (n=1,126) between 2005 and 2014.
- Comparison of baseline characteristics, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) changes, and MACCE over a mean follow-up of 3.1 years.
- Multivariable adjustment was used to analyze three-year outcomes, including all-cause mortality, cardiac death, stroke, and repeat revascularization.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in LVEF improvement was observed between PCI and CABG groups at 3 months, 1 year, or 3 years.
- After multivariable adjustment, three-year risks of all-cause mortality and cardiac death were not statistically significant between groups.
- The CABG group had a higher rate of stroke but a lower rate of repeat revascularization compared to the PCI group.
Conclusions:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is non-inferior to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in terms of long-term survival for CAD patients with HFrEF.
- PCI should be considered a viable alternative revascularization strategy for patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
- The choice of revascularization strategy may depend on specific patient factors and desired endpoints, such as stroke risk and need for repeat procedures.
Abstract:
Objectives: To explore the short and long term outcomes of coronary artery disease(CAD) patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) after two different revascularization strategies. Methods: The CAD patients with HFrEF who had undegone successful revascularization from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2014 in Anzhen Hospital were analyzed based on registries. The baseline characteristics, changes of left heart function and the MACCE after a mean follow-up of 3.1 years were compared. Results: A total of 1 813 CAD patients with HFrEF who had undergone successful PCI (n=687) or CABG (n=1 126) satisfied the inclusion criteria were included. The age of all patients included was (59.6±10.0) years and male patients accounted for 83.1%. For the coronary angiographic features, the CABG group showed higher SYNTAX score (27.3±10.2 vs 31.1±10.4, P<0.01) and greater left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) [(59.8±7.2) vs (57.9±7.7)mm, P<0.001]. The LVEF before revascularization was similar in PCI and CABG group [(35.8±5.1)% vs (35.9±4.6)%, P>0.05]. At three-month, one-year or three-year follow-up after revascularization, the improvement of LVEF was similar in the two groups (P>0.05). After multivariable adjustment, three-year outcomes revealed that the risks of all-cause mortality and cardiac death were not statistically significant between CABG and PCI group (16.3% vs 14.3%, HR=1.5, 95%CI: 1.2-2.1, P=0.07; 8.5% vs 8.2%, HR=1.3, 95%CI: 1.1-1.4, P=0.20). With regards to other endpoints, CABG group had a higher rate of stroke (6.2% vs 2.9%, HR=2.9, 95%CI:2.3-3.6, P<0.01) but a lower rate of repeat revascularization (6.5% vs 15.1%, HR=0.5, 95%CI:0.3-0.7, P<0.01) compared to PCI group. And for patients with SYNTAX score≥33, PCI group showed a comparable risk of all-cause mortality or cardiac death (HR=0.8, 95%CI: 0.4-1.3, P=0.06; HR=0.7, 95%CI:0.4-1.0, P=0.90). Conclusions: In CAD patients with HFrEF who had undergone successful revascularization, PCI is not inferior to CABG for long-term survival. PCI should be taken into consideration to become an alternative strategy in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

