Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2025

Emergency Undocking in Robotic Surgery: A Simulation Curriculum
Published on: May 20, 2018
The impact of a structured handover checklist for intraoperative staff shift changes on effective communication, OR
Ebrahim Nasiri1, Mojgan Lotfi2, Seyyed Muhammad Mahdi Mahdavinoor3
1Assistant Professor of Traditional Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Operating Room, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Objective:
Handover without a structured format is prone to the omission of information and could be a potential risk to patient safety. We sought to determine the effect of a structured checklist on the quality of intraoperative change of shift handover between scrubs and circulars.
Methods:
We conducted a control intervention study on operating room wards of two teaching hospitals from 20 Feb to 21 Nov 2020. This research was conducted in three stages as follows: assessing the current situation (as a group before the intervention), performing the intervention and evaluating the effect of using a checklist on handover quality after the intervention in two groups: with and without checklist. We examined the quality of handover between scrub and circular personnel in terms of handover duration and quality, omission of information and improvement in OR staff satisfaction.
Results:
A total of 120 handovers were observed and evaluated. After intervention in the group using the checklist, the percentage of information omission in surgical report was decreased from 19.5 to 12.1% between scrubs (P < 0.00) and from 16.8 to 14.1% between circulars (P < 0.03). Also, in the role of scrub, the mean overall score of handover process quality was significantly higher after the intervention (x̄ = 7 ± 1.5) than before it (x̄ = 6.5 ± 0.9) (p < 0.02). In the role of circulating, despite the positive effect of overall score checklist, no significant difference was observed (p < 0.08). The use of checklist significantly increased the handover duration between scrubs (p < 0.03) and circulars (p < 0.00). The overall mean percentage of handover satisfaction increased from 67.5% before the intervention to 85.5% after the intervention (p < 0.00).
Conclusion:
The implementation of a new structured handover checklist had a positive impact on improving the quality of communication between the surgical team, reducing the information omission rate and increasing the satisfaction.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Reports I: Hands-off Report
Following are the key components and categories of hand-off reports:
Purpose and Process:
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Obedience

