Related Experiment Videos
THE CROATIAN HEALTH INSURANCE FUND DOES NOT RECOGNIZE DIFFERENCES IN THE COST OF DIFFERENT TREATMENTS FOR REVISION
Srećko Sabalić1, Dinko Vidović1, Slaven Babić1
11Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia; 2School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia; 3School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; 4University of Applied Health Sciences, Zagreb, Croatia; 5School of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia; 6Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia.
Insights
Revision hip arthroplasty (THA) is costly, especially for infections. Current health insurance reimbursements are inadequate and do not cover the actual treatment costs for revision THA, impacting healthcare providers.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Health Economics
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) interventions incur significant treatment costs.
- Infection is a major factor contributing to the high expense of revision THA.
- Existing literature highlights the financial burden associated with revision arthroplasty.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare treatment costs and health insurance reimbursements for revision THA.
- To analyze financial differences between revision THA for infection versus aseptic indications (instability, fracture).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of hospital data for 168 patients undergoing revision THA (2010-2018).
- Financial data collected from Hospital Information System, including total cost per patient, implant costs, and length of stay.
- Comparison of total costs against Croatian Health Insurance Fund reimbursements.
Main Results:
- The Croatian Health Insurance Fund reimbursement does not differentiate costs for aseptic instability, infection, or periprosthetic fracture.
- Mean cost differences per patient were -262.83 € (aseptic instability), -1694.94 € (infection), and -916.49 € (periprosthetic fracture).
- Reimbursements were found to be inadequate for centers performing revision hip surgery.
Conclusions:
- Current health insurance reimbursement structures are insufficient for the actual costs of revision THA.
- The financial model does not account for the increased complexity and cost associated with infected revision hip arthroplasty.
- Policy review is needed to ensure adequate reimbursement for revision hip surgery to maintain quality of care.
Abstract:
In recent years, there has been increased interest in the cost of treatment for revision interventions for hip and knee prostheses. In all publications so far, the authors note the high cost of treatment for revision interventions, especially if infection is present. The aim of this study was to compare the cost of treatment and health insurance reimbursements between revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) for infection and revision for aseptic indications (aseptic instability and periprosthetic fracture). Hospital data on 168 patients having undergone revision THA between 2010 and 2018 at the Department of Traumatology, Sestre milosrdnice University Hospital Centre from Zagreb were analyzed. Financial data were collected from the Hospital Information System. Financial analysis included total cost per patient, Croatian Health Insurance Fund reimbursements, cost of implants, and length of hospital stay. The difference between the mean total cost per patient and the mean Croatian Health Insurance Fund reimbursements was -262.83 € (-6.08%) for aseptic instability, -1694.94 € (-17.25%) for infection and -916.49 € (-17.33%) for periprosthetic fracture. The Croatian Health Insurance Fund does not recognize differences in the cost of revision THA for aseptic instability, infection and periprosthetic fracture. Health insurance reimbursement is inadequate for centers that offer revision hip surgery.
Related Concept Videos
Traditional Level Of Health Care System
The preventive healthcare service includes tests for screening. Preventive health care services include identifying and reducing disease risk...
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Secondary Healthcare System
Standards of Care II
Standards of Care I