Influence of the fitting window on the O₂ uptake kinetics at the onset of moderate intensity exercise

The O₂ uptake (V̇o₂) data at the onset of an exercise are usually fitted with a mono-exponential function, after removal of the data pertaining to a conventional initial time period (ΔTr) lasting ∼20 s. We performed a thorough quantitative analysis on the effects of removing data pertaining to different ΔTr, aiming at identifying an objective method to establish the appropriate ΔTr. Breath-by-breath O₂ uptake responses, acquired from 25 healthy adults performing a step moderate-intensity exercise, and 10⁴ simulated biexponential responses, were analyzed. For all the responses, the kinetic parameters of a mono-exponential function and the corresponding asymptotic standard errors (ASEs) were estimated by nonlinear regression, removing the data pertaining to progressively longer initial periods (1 s each) up to 60 s. Four methods to establish objectively ΔTr were compared. The minimum estimated τ was obtained for ΔTr ≅ 35 s in both the V̇o₂ and simulated data, that was about 30% lower compared with that obtained for ΔTr ≅ 0s. The average ASE values remained quite constant up to ΔTr ≅ 35 s, thereafter they increased remarkably. The τ used to generate the simulated response fell within the confidence intervals of the estimated τ in ∼85% of cases for ΔTr = 20 s ("20 s-w" method); this percentage increased to ∼92% of cases when ΔTr was established according to both the minimum τ and its narrowest confidence interval ("Mixed" method). In conclusion, the effects of removing V̇o₂ data pertaining to different ΔTr are remarkable. The "Mixed" method provided estimated parameters close to those used to generate the simulated responses and is thus endorsed.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We propose a method to objectively establish the initial time period to be removed from the fitting window when, using a mono-exponential model, the kinetics of the fundamental component is determined on breath-by-breath O₂ uptake data collected at the onset of a moderate-intensity exercise. Innovative statistical parameters ("Coverage" and "Concordance_5%," applicable on simulated responses) were used to compare its performance with that of other three methods. The proposed method yielded the best "Coverage" and "Concordance_5%."