Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 27, 2025

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Legal Admissibility of the Competence Assessment for Standing Trial for Defendants with Mental Retardation (CAST-MR)
Mary E Wood1, Kimberly P Brown1, Amanda R Bitting1
1Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
Abstract:
The Competence Assessment for Standing Trial for Defendants with Mental Retardation (CAST-MR) was developed to assess competence to stand trial in defendants with Intellectual Disability. Although it remains the only validated instrument for this population, previous research has suggested it is rarely used by forensic examiners, a finding our survey of legal cases confirms. Initial validation studies provided some support for the instrument's reliability and validity. However, in both these and subsequent studies, there were significant limitations with respect to the size and representativeness of study samples, and therefore the associated interpretation of scores, such that questions remain as to whether the tool adequately assesses competence to stand trial in this population. In this paper, we review the research on the CAST-MR, discuss the strengths and limitations of the instrument, and debate its legal admissibility.
Related Concept Videos
Eyewitness Memory
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
Intellectual Disability

