Primary versus modified secondary closure techniques for persistent tracheocutaneous fistula in pediatric patients
Sung Joon Park1, Sun A Han2, Tack-Kyun Kwon3
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Insights
Modified secondary healing offers a faster and safer approach for closing pediatric tracheocutaneous fistulas (TCFs) compared to primary closure, reducing complications and hospital stay.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Surgery
- Surgical Techniques
- Wound Healing
Background:
- Persistent tracheocutaneous fistulas (TCFs) can complicate pediatric care after tracheostomy.
- Effective closure techniques are crucial for patient recovery and well-being.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of primary closure versus a modified secondary healing technique for pediatric TCF closure.
- To evaluate perioperative and postoperative outcomes for both TCF closure methods.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective study of 103 pediatric patients with persistent TCFs.
- Comparison of outcomes between primary closure (Group 1) and modified secondary healing (Group 2).
Main Results:
- Modified secondary healing (Group 2) involved younger patients and shorter intervals from decannulation to closure.
- Group 2 demonstrated significantly shorter procedural times and hospital stays.
- The modified secondary healing technique resulted in lower complication rates, revision surgeries, and recannulation rates.
Conclusions:
- Modified secondary healing is a more efficient and safer surgical technique for pediatric TCF closure.
- This method allows for quicker closure of persistent TCFs in younger patients post-decannulation.
- The findings support modified secondary healing as an effective strategy for managing pediatric TCFs.
Purpose:
This study aimed at compating two closure techniques for tracheocutaneous fistulas (TCFs) in pediatric patients.
Methods:
A total of 106 consecutive pediatric patients who underwent closure of a persistent TCF between April 2007 and February 2021 at a tertiary pediatric hospital were evaluated, and 103 pediatric patients aged between 12 months and 18 years were included. The clinical characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative outcomes were compared between TCF closure by primary closure (Group 1) and a modified secondary healing technique (Group 2).
Results:
Of the 103 patients, 58 were classified into Group 1, and 45 into Group 2. The mean age at tracheostomy and TCF closure was significantly younger in Group 2, and the interval between decannulation to TCF closure was significantly shorter in Group 2. Procedural time and hospital stay were significantly shorter in Group 2 than Group 1. Group 2 had a significantly lower complication rate, need for revision surgery, and recannulation rate than Group 1.
Conclusions:
Modified secondary healing was more efficient in terms of procedural time and hospital stay, and safer (i.e., fewer complications). It is an effective surgical technique for closing a persistent TCF in younger patients more quickly after decannulation compared to primary closure.
Related Concept Videos
Tracheostomy: Procedure and Tubes
Tracheostomy tubes can be made of semiflexible plastic (polyurethane or silicone), rigid plastic, or metal, and they come in...
Tracheostomy Decannulation
Description of the Procedure
Decannulation refers to the permanent removal of the tracheostomy tube, signaling the resolution of the condition that initially necessitated the tracheostomy. The process requires a well-coordinated interplay between...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
Tracheostomy Care II: Procedure
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene, and put on personal protective equipment: gown, gloves, mask...
Tracheostomy Care I: Pre-procedural Steps
Required Equipment
The equipment necessary for tracheostomy care includes:
Tracheostomy Suctioning II: Procedure


