Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 31, 2026
Laparoscopic Radical Gastrectomy for Remnant Gastric Cancer
Published on: October 31, 2025
Surgery-Based Salvage for Locoregional Recurrent Salivary Gland Carcinoma: Comparative Survival Evidence from a
Gene Huh1, Jeong Wook Kang2, Geun-Jeon Kim3
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Objectives.:
To compare survival outcomes between surgery-based salvage and non-surgical management in patients with locoregional recurrent salivary gland carcinoma (RSGC), and to explore whether surgery-based salvage is associated with more favorable outcomes in appropriately selected patients.
Methods.:
A search was performed in MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Observational studies were included that reported comparative outcomes for surgery-based salvage (resection ± adjuvant therapy) versus non-surgical management (re-irradiation, brachytherapy, systemic therapy, or palliative treatment) in locoregional recurrent disease. Patients with distant metastasis at recurrence were excluded from the pooled analysis. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated as non-surgical management versus surgery-based salvage and pooled using a random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using RoBANS 2.0.
Results.:
Five retrospective comparative studies (N = 163) met the inclusion criteria. Four studies contributed to a meta-analysis for OS (N = 153) and DFS (N = 145). In pooled observational analyses, non-surgical management showed higher hazard estimates for OS (pooled HR = 3.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-9.84; p = 0.024) and DFS (pooled HR = 3.09; 95% CI, 1.21-7.91; p = 0.019) than surgery-based salvage. Heterogeneity was considerable for OS (I² = 80.1%) and moderate for DFS (I² = 56.4%). Most studies had moderate-to-high risk of bias, particularly for participant comparability and residual confounding.
Conclusion.:
Available comparative observational evidence suggests that surgery-based salvage may be associated with more favorable survival outcomes in appropriately selected patients with locoregional RSGC. However, the evidence base is small, retrospective, and clinically heterogeneous; therefore, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory rather than confirmatory, and treatment decisions should be individualized within a multidisciplinary approach.