Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

Yeast As a Chassis for Developing Functional Assays to Study Human P53
Published on: August 4, 2019
SLC7A11 Is a Superior Determinant of APR-246 (Eprenetapopt) Response than TP53 Mutation Status
Kenji M Fujihara1,2, Mariana Corrales Benitez3, Carlos S Cabalag3,2,4
1Gastrointestinal Cancer Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Nicholas.clemons@petermac.org Kenji.fujihara@petermac.org.
Abstract:
APR-246 (eprenetapopt) is in clinical development with a focus on hematologic malignancies and is promoted as a mutant-p53 reactivation therapy. Currently, the detection of at least one TP53 mutation is an inclusion criterion for patient selection into most APR-246 clinical trials. Preliminary results from our phase Ib/II clinical trial investigating APR-246 combined with doublet chemotherapy [cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)] in metastatic esophageal cancer, together with previous preclinical studies, indicate that TP53 mutation status alone may not be a sufficient biomarker for APR-246 response. This study aims to identify a robust biomarker for response to APR-246. Correlation analysis of the PRIMA-1 activity (lead compound to APR-246) with mutational status, gene expression, protein expression, and metabolite abundance across over 700 cancer cell lines (CCL) was performed. Functional validation and a boutique siRNA screen of over 850 redox-related genes were also conducted. TP53 mutation status was not consistently predictive of response to APR-246. The expression of SLC7A11, the cystine/glutamate transporter, was identified as a superior determinant of response to APR-246. Genetic regulators of SLC7A11, including ATF4, MDM2, wild-type p53, and c-Myc, were confirmed to also regulate cancer-cell sensitivity to APR-246. In conclusion, SLC7A11 expression is a broadly applicable determinant of sensitivity to APR-246 across cancer and should be utilized as the key predictive biomarker to stratify patients for future clinical investigation of APR-246.
Insights
APR-246 (eprenetapopt) response is not solely predicted by TP53 mutations. SLC7A11 expression is a superior biomarker for patient selection in APR-246 clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Cancer Therapeutics
Background:
- APR-246 (eprenetapopt) is a mutant-p53 reactivation therapy primarily investigated for hematologic malignancies.
- TP53 mutation status is currently a key criterion for patient selection in APR-246 clinical trials.
- Emerging data suggest TP53 mutation status alone may be insufficient for predicting APR-246 efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify a robust predictive biomarker for response to APR-246 (eprenetapopt).
- To evaluate the utility of TP53 mutation status versus other molecular markers in predicting APR-246 sensitivity.
- To determine the role of SLC7A11 expression as a predictive biomarker for APR-246.
Main Methods:
- Correlation analysis of PRIMA-1 (APR-246 precursor) activity with molecular data (mutation, gene/protein expression, metabolite abundance) across over 700 cancer cell lines.
- Functional validation studies and a siRNA screen of over 850 redox-related genes.
- Assessment of genetic regulators of SLC7A11, including ATF4, MDM2, wild-type p53, and c-Myc, in relation to APR-246 sensitivity.
Main Results:
- TP53 mutation status was not consistently predictive of response to APR-246.
- SLC7A11 expression, encoding the cystine/glutamate transporter, emerged as a superior determinant of APR-246 response.
- Expression levels of SLC7A11 regulators (ATF4, MDM2, wild-type p53, c-Myc) also correlated with cancer cell sensitivity to APR-246.
Conclusions:
- SLC7A11 expression is a broadly applicable determinant of sensitivity to APR-246 across various cancer types.
- SLC7A11 should be utilized as the primary predictive biomarker for stratifying patients in future APR-246 clinical trials.
- This finding may improve patient selection and treatment outcomes for APR-246 therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Abnormal Proliferation

