Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Prophylactic Pyloric Dilatation and its Impact on Early Delayed Gastric Conduit Emptying and Pneumonia
Jonathan Sivakumar1,2,3, Shaun Chew4, Amass Zheng5
1Division of Cancer Surgery, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. sivakumar.jonathan@gmail.com.
Background:
Early delayed gastric conduit emptying (DGCE) and pneumonia are among the most common complications following oesophagectomy. These issues can be challenging to address during minimally invasive surgery with pyloroplasty or pyloromyotomy. This study evaluated the impact of prophylactic endoscopic pyloric balloon dilatation (PBD) on early postoperative outcomes.
Methods:
Consecutive patients undergoing oesophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction for cancer at two Australian tertiary centres (2017-2025) were retrospectively analysed. From 2023, intraoperative endoscopic-assisted PBD using a 20 mm balloon inflated for two minutes across the pylorus was adopted as standard practice. Primary endpoints were early DGCE and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) within 30 days; secondary endpoints included nasogastric tube (NGT) output and duration, and hospital length-of-stay. Associations were examined using multivariable logistic regression and inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment (IPWRA).
Results:
Of 187 patients, 40 (21.4%) received PBD. Compared with controls, PBD was associated with reduced DGCE (15% vs. 40.1%; odds ratio [OR] 0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.65) and HAP (20% vs. 40.8%; OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.80). Pyloric balloon dilatation independently predicted lower DGCE (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.91) and HAP (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05-0.67), with absolute risk reductions of 27.4% and 30.8% respectively on IPWRA analysis. Pyloric balloon dilatation was also associated with lower postoperative NGT outputs, earlier NGT removal (median 6 [interquartile range (IQR) 4-11] vs. 4 [IQR 3-7] days; p = 0.032), and shorter hospital length of stay (median 13 [IQR 9-22] vs. 9 [IQR 8-16] days; p = 0.007).
Conclusions:
Prophylactic PBD was associated with lower early DGCE and pneumonia. This enabled earlier nasogastric tube removal and shorter hospital stay, supporting its integration into contemporary practice.
Related Concept Videos
Pyloric Obstruction
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...