Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Bone remodeling around implants placed after socket preservation: a 10-year retrospective radiological study.
Crespi Roberto1,2, Toti Paolo3,4, Crespi Giovanni4
1School of Dentistry, Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences, Via di Sant'Alessandro, 8, 00131, Rome, Italy. editorial.activities@istitutostomatologicotoscano.it.
Porcine bone grafting offered better short-term results for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. However, collagen alone showed comparable long-term alveolar width maintenance and better buccal plate coverage around implants.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Periodontology
- Regenerative Medicine
Background:
- Post-extraction socket management is crucial for maintaining alveolar ridge dimensions.
- Ridge preservation techniques aim to minimize bone resorption after tooth removal.
- Comparing grafting materials like porcine xenografts and collagen is essential for optimizing treatment outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of ridge preservation using porcine xenograft versus collagen alone.
- To evaluate alveolar width changes and implant stability over a 10-year period.
- To assess adverse events and the long-term maintenance of the buccal plate covering implants.
Main Methods:
- Single-tooth extraction in the posterior mandible followed by socket grafting with either porcine bone or collagen sponge.
- Ridge expansion technique with immediate implant placement performed 2-3 months post-extraction.
- Long-term follow-up (10 years) evaluating alveolar width changes, implant survival, and buccal plate coverage.
Main Results:
- Both grafting materials showed significant long-term width increases after ridge splitting and bone expansion.
- No significant differences in alveolar width were observed between groups at the 10-year follow-up.
- The porcine bone group (Group A) exhibited significantly poorer long-term buccal bone coverage around implants compared to the collagen group (Group B).
Conclusions:
- Porcine bone grafting demonstrated superior short-term outcomes in ridge preservation.
- Collagen sponge alone provided comparable long-term alveolar width maintenance.
- Porcine bone grafting was associated with reduced long-term stability of the buccal plate compared to collagen.
More Related Videos
05:54Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
07:41An Intramedullary Locking Nail for Standardized Fixation of Femur Osteotomies to Analyze Normal and Defective Bone Healing in Mice
Published on: November 13, 2016