Assessing measurement invariance in the EORTC QLQ-C30.
Janneke van Roij1,2,3, Jacobien M Kieffer4, Lonneke van de Poll-Franse5,6,4
1The Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, PO box 19079, Utrecht, 3501, DB, The Netherlands. j.vanroij@iknl.nl.
Measurement invariance (MI) of the European Organisation for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) was confirmed across most cancer patient subgroups. Valid comparisons of EORTC QLQ-C30 latent means are possible, supporting its use in diverse populations.
Area of Science:
- Psychometrics
- Cancer Research
- Health Outcomes
Background:
- The European Organisation for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) is widely used to assess cancer patient quality of life.
- Ensuring measurement invariance (MI) is crucial for valid cross-group comparisons of quality of life (QoL) data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the measurement invariance (MI) of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in a heterogeneous sample of cancer patients.
- To assess the validity of using the EORTC QLQ-C30 across diverse patient subgroups.
Main Methods:
- Secondary analysis of data from 7007 patients across 12 studies in the PROFILES registry.
- Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MGCFA) was used to test MI across subgroups (cancer site, age, sex, time since diagnosis, life stage).
- Impact of parameter equality on latent factor means was evaluated by releasing constraints.
Main Results:
- The EORTC QLQ-C30 demonstrated the highest MI across groups based on time since diagnosis and life stage.
- Moderate MI was observed across groups based on sex, age, and primary tumor site.
- Item-level analysis showed minimal impact of non-invariance on latent factor means.
Conclusions:
- Valid conclusions can be drawn from between-group comparisons of EORTC QLQ-C30 latent means.
- Further research on MI in other subgroups (e.g., treatment effects, ethnicity) is recommended.
- MI evaluations are essential for developing and validating measurement instruments.
Related Concept Videos
Cochran's Q Test
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Self-Report Tests of Personality


