Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2025

06:18
Pedicle Screw Placement Using an Augmented Reality Head-Mounted Display in a Porcine Model
Published on: May 24, 2024
2.4K
Augmented reality head-mounted display-based incision planning in cranial neurosurgery: a prospective pilot study
Michael E Ivan1,2, Daniel G Eichberg1, Long Di1
11Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine; and.
Neurosurgical Focus
|August 1, 2021
Summary
Augmented reality (AR) offers a feasible, hands-free alternative for brain tumor border mapping during surgery. This pilot study shows AR can be integrated into the operating room workflow, improving navigation efficiency.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Medical Technology
- Surgical Navigation
Background:
- Monitor and wand-based neuronavigation stations (MWBNSs) are standard in cranial neurosurgery but are cumbersome, requiring OR rearrangement and interrupting surgical workflow.
- Current MWBNSs necessitate surgeons using a hand to manipulate a wand and pausing to check a remote monitor, hindering bimanual techniques and real-time guidance.
- There is a need for continuous, real-time, hands-free neuronavigation solutions to improve surgical efficiency and workflow.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the feasibility of using augmented reality (AR) with a head-mounted display for mapping brain tumor borders.
- To compare the accuracy and correspondence of AR-based tumor border tracing with traditional MWBNS tracing.
- To assess AR's potential to streamline intraoperative neuronavigation in cranial neurosurgery.
Main Methods:
- A prospective pilot study involving 11 patients undergoing elective craniotomy for tumor resection.
- Surgeons used the OpenSight application on HoloLens AR glasses for tumor border tracing prior to incision.
- Tumor border tracings were compared to those obtained using the StealthStation S8 MWBNS, with blinded neurosurgeons rating correspondence and objective overlap measurements calculated.
Main Results:
- AR tracing was successfully implemented in all 11 patient procedures.
- Neurosurgeons rated the correspondence between AR and MWBNS tracings: 5 excellent, 5 adequate, and 1 poor.
- High inter-rater agreement was observed in the subjective correspondence ratings.
Conclusions:
- Augmented reality (AR) is a feasible technology for intraoperative neuronavigation and preoperative tumor border identification in neurosurgery.
- AR can be integrated into the surgical workflow, offering a hands-free alternative to traditional navigation systems.
- Further research is required to optimize AR accuracy and explore its full potential in neurosurgical applications.
Keywords:
augmented realitybrain tumorresidency trainingsurgical planningtechnology assessment and innovationtraining tools and simulation
