Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.3K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

37
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
37
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.8K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.8K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

3.5K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
3.5K
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

184
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
184
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

207
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
207

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A cohort study of obese patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis using biological medicines in Catalonia, Spain.

Dermatology reports·2026
Same author

Haploidentical transplant, gene therapy, and standard care in sickle cell disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Blood·2026
Same author

Increasingly Reversible Na/Cl<sub>2</sub> and Li/Cl<sub>2</sub> Batteries.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2026
Same author

Barriers to effective first-line treatment for women with iron deficiency.

Expert review of hematology·2026
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of iron deficiency screening in pregnancy across ferritin-based thresholds.

Blood advances·2026
Same author

The Prevalence of Fibromyalgia in the General Population and At-Risk Subpopulations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

815

Assessing the quality of randomization methods in randomized control trials.

Deborah Lai1, Daniel Wang2, Matthew McGillivray3

  • 1University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
|August 3, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Proper randomization is crucial for unbiased clinical trials. However, most study protocols in ClinicalTrials.gov lack clear descriptions of their randomization methods, hindering reliable treatment evaluation.

Keywords:
Complete randomizationMinimization randomizationPermuted-block randomizationRandomizationRandomized clinical trialStudy protocol

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
06:13

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.4K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

815
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
06:13

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.4K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.8K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Randomization is a cornerstone of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), essential for minimizing population bias.
  • Effective randomization ensures comparable groups for accurate treatment effect evaluation.
  • The quality of randomization descriptions directly impacts the reliability of trial outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the methodological quality of randomization method descriptions in clinical trial protocols.
  • To identify common practices and deficiencies in reporting randomization techniques.

Main Methods:

  • A cross-sectional review of phase 3 clinical trials from ClinicalTrials.gov was conducted.
  • 1528 protocols were identified, with 517 excluded for non-randomized designs or missing protocols, and 693 for unclear randomization.
  • Three independent reviewers extracted and classified randomization methods based on established criteria.

Main Results:

  • Only 20.8% of study protocols clearly described their randomization method.
  • The Permuted-Block Design was the most frequently reported method (85.9%) among those with defined protocols.
  • A significant majority (77.7%) of protocols provided incomplete or unclear information on randomization.

Conclusions:

  • The majority of randomized controlled trial protocols in ClinicalTrials.gov offer inadequate information on randomization methods.
  • Improved reporting standards for randomization are necessary to ensure the integrity and validity of clinical trial research.
  • Inadequate randomization descriptions compromise the ability to generate unbiased comparison groups and evaluate treatments effectively.