Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Biological Effects of Radiation02:59

Biological Effects of Radiation

16.4K
All radioactive nuclides emit high-energy particles or electromagnetic waves. When this radiation encounters living cells, it can cause heating, break chemical bonds, or ionize molecules. The most serious biological damage results when these radioactive emissions fragment or ionize molecules. For example, α and β particles emitted from nuclear decay reactions possess much higher energies than ordinary chemical bond energies. When these particles strike and penetrate matter, they...
16.4K
Radiation: Applications01:17

Radiation: Applications

1.3K
The average temperature of Earth is the subject of much current discussion. Earth is in radiative contact with both the Sun and dark space; it receives almost all its energy from the radiation of the Sun and reflects some of it into outer space. Dark space is very cold, about 3 K, so Earth radiates energy into it. For instance, heat transfer occurs from soil and grasses, the rate of which can be so rapid that frost can occur on clear summer evenings, even in warm latitudes.
The average...
1.3K
X-ray Imaging01:24

X-ray Imaging

9.0K
German physicist Wilhelm Röntgen (1845–1923) was experimenting with electrical current when he discovered that a mysterious and invisible "ray" would pass through his flesh but leave an outline of his bones on a screen coated with a metal compound. In 1895, Röntgen made the first durable record of the internal parts of a living human: an "X-ray" image (as it came to be called) of his wife’s hand. Scientists worldwide quickly began their own experiments with...
9.0K
Absorption of Radiation01:05

Absorption of Radiation

939
The rate of heat transfer by emitted radiation is described by the Stefan-Boltzmann law of radiation:
939
Positron Emission Tomography01:29

Positron Emission Tomography

6.3K
Positron emission tomography (PET) is a medical imaging technique involving radiopharmaceuticals — substances that emit short-lived radiation. Although the first PET scanner was introduced in 1961, it took 15 more years before radiopharmaceuticals were combined with the technique and revolutionized its potential.
One of the main requirements of a PET scan is a positron-emitting radioisotope, which is produced in a cyclotron and then attached to a substance used by the part of the body...
6.3K
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT01:30

Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT

517
Radiological investigations, including X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans, are critical for diagnosing and evaluating various medical conditions. These imaging techniques provide valuable insights into the body's internal structures, aiding in the detection of abnormalities, assessment of disease progression, and development of treatment strategies. This article delves into two primary radiological investigations, chest X-rays and CT scans, outlining their purpose, procedures, and...
517

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Preparing medical and pharmacy students for collaborative working in primary care: the value of interprofessional practice-based course in medicines optimisation.

Journal of interprofessional care·2025
Same author

Perspectives of the role of ICRP and the system of protection in meeting the United Nations sustainable development goals.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2024
Same author

The Emirates Mars Mission.

Space science reviews·2022
Same author

Can Real-world Data and Rapid Learning Drive Improvements in Lung Cancer Survival? The RAPID-RT Study.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2022
Same author

Reflection on the proposed changes to dose quantities-an industrial perspective.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2021
Same author

ALARA in practice-4 decades of radiological protection at Goesgen NPP.

Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.4K

Reflections on low-dose radiation, the misconceptions, reality and moving forward.

M Lips1, E Anderson2, T Nakamura3

  • 1Kernkraftwerk Gösgen-Däniken, Postfach CH-4658 Däniken, Switzerland.

Journal of Radiological Protection : Official Journal of the Society for Radiological Protection
|August 3, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Low dose radiation poses minimal health risks, contrary to public and regulatory over-conservatism. Recontextualizing radiation hazards highlights the benefits of nuclear science and the absence of discernible effects from low dose exposure.

Keywords:
LNTall hazard approachcollective doselow doseoptimisation

More Related Videos

Use of a Linear Accelerator for Conducting In Vitro Radiobiology Experiments
06:08

Use of a Linear Accelerator for Conducting In Vitro Radiobiology Experiments

Published on: May 26, 2019

7.7K
Intestinal Epithelial Regeneration in Response to Ionizing Irradiation
09:10

Intestinal Epithelial Regeneration in Response to Ionizing Irradiation

Published on: July 27, 2022

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

7.4K
Use of a Linear Accelerator for Conducting In Vitro Radiobiology Experiments
06:08

Use of a Linear Accelerator for Conducting In Vitro Radiobiology Experiments

Published on: May 26, 2019

7.7K
Intestinal Epithelial Regeneration in Response to Ionizing Irradiation
09:10

Intestinal Epithelial Regeneration in Response to Ionizing Irradiation

Published on: July 27, 2022

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Radiation protection
  • Nuclear science and technology

Background:

  • Current radiation protection principles and regulations exhibit over-conservatism regarding low dose radiation.
  • This over-conservatism has fostered disproportionate public and governmental fear of radiation.
  • The significant societal benefits of nuclear science and techniques are often overlooked due to this fear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for a re-evaluation of radiation hazards associated with low dose exposure.
  • To promote greater public and governmental awareness regarding the minimal risks of low dose radiation.
  • To recontextualize the perception of radiation risks, emphasizing the benefits of nuclear applications.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing radiation protection principles and regulatory frameworks.
  • Analysis of the scientific consensus on the health effects of low dose radiation.
  • Advocacy for revised risk perception and communication strategies.

Main Results:

  • Evidence suggests that low dose radiation presents a very low, if any, risk to human health.
  • Over-conservative regulations do not accurately reflect the scientific understanding of low dose radiation effects.
  • A significant disparity exists between the perceived and actual risks of low dose radiation.

Conclusions:

  • The radiation protection community largely accepts the minimal risk associated with low dose radiation.
  • A recontextualization of low dose radiation hazards is necessary to address public and regulatory misconceptions.
  • Increased awareness of the absence of discernible health effects from low dose radiation is crucial for appreciating nuclear science benefits.