Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Psychophysiological Assessment of the Effectiveness of Emotion Regulation Strategies in Childhood
Published on: February 11, 2017
Family and individual risk factors for triangulation: Evaluating evidence for emotion coaching buffering effects
Devin M McCauley1,2, Gregory M Fosco1,2
1Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract:
Adolescents who are triangulated into interparental conflict are at increased risk for psychological maladjustment. However, little is known about factors that may predict family risk for triangulating adolescents, or protective factors that can off-set this risk. In this study, we conducted longitudinal tests of family, parent, and adolescent factors that might predict increases in triangulation over time. The sample included 174 adolescents and their mother figures from two-parent families (58% female; Mage = 14.75 years) who provided data on two occasions, six months apart. Hierarchical linear regression models evaluated family, parent, and adolescent risk factors for triangulation into interparental conflict, and subsequently parent's emotion coaching and adolescent gender as potential moderators of risk for triangulation. Findings revealed that low family cohesion, parent depression, and adolescent difficulties with emotion regulation represented risks for triangulation. Parent emotion coaching moderated the association between low interparental love and triangulation differentially based on adolescent gender.
Related Concept Videos
Coping Strategies: Emotion Focused
The Influence of Cognition on Affect
Socioemotional Development during Infancy
Primary Temperament Types
Cognitive Theories: Schachter-Singer Theory of Emotion
Physiological Arousal and Cognitive Labeling
According to this theory, when an individual experiences...
Protecting Self-Esteem
Self-Discrepancy and Its Effects

