Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
A qualitative investigation of reasoning behind decisions to decline participation in a research intervention: A
Christopher P Dwyer1, Anusha Moses1, Fionnuala M Rogers1
1National University of Ireland, Ireland.
Abstract:
The current study-within-a-trial explored individuals' decisions to decline participation in research trialling a chronic illness-focused therapy (i.e. multiple sclerosis). Four themes were identified from seven semi-structured interviews with participation decliners and were confirmed by the host trial's Patient & Public Involvement (PPI) panel: acknowledgement of the value of research; 'fit' of the study; misinterpretation of participant information; and 'ignorance is bliss' - discussed in light of theory and research. This study-within-a-trial extends research on trial recruitment and participation decline; while also suggesting that PPI can be utilised in both a practical and impactful manner.
Insights
Understanding why patients decline research participation is crucial for clinical trials. Key reasons include perceived study fit, information misinterpretation, and a desire for
Area of Science:
- Clinical research methodology
- Patient recruitment strategies
- Chronic illness management
Background:
- Understanding participation decline is vital for effective clinical trial recruitment.
- Chronic illness trials face unique recruitment challenges.
- Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) can enhance research processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore reasons why individuals decline participation in a chronic illness therapy trial.
- To identify key themes influencing decisions to opt-out of clinical research.
- To assess the role of PPI in understanding participation barriers.
Main Methods:
- A study-within-a-trial design was employed.
- Seven semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals who declined trial participation.
- Thematic analysis was used to identify key decision-making factors.
- Findings were validated by the host trial's Patient & Public Involvement (PPI) panel.
Main Results:
- Four primary themes emerged: acknowledgement of research value, study 'fit', information misinterpretation, and 'ignorance is bliss'.
- These themes highlight diverse patient perspectives on research participation.
- PPI panel confirmation underscored the practical relevance of the identified themes.
Conclusions:
- Patient decisions to decline research participation are multifactorial.
- Addressing information clarity and study relevance can improve recruitment.
- PPI offers a valuable mechanism for understanding and mitigating participation barriers in clinical trials.
- This study provides insights for optimizing recruitment strategies in chronic illness research.
More Related Videos
06:45Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Longitudinal Research
Blinding
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Naturalistic Observations
Blind Procedures