Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2025

06:13
Endoscopic Septoplasty with Limited Two-line Resection: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Septal Deviation
Published on: June 20, 2018
17.2K
[Total nasal defect reconstruction with nasal prosthesis. Two case reports]
K A Veselova1, I N Antonova1, N V Gromova1
1Maxillofacial Surgery and Dentistry Research Institute of Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Summary
Maxillofacial prostheses offer a reliable solution for total nasal defects, restoring appearance and improving quality of life. This article details the advantages, disadvantages, and manufacturing process of these prostheses.
Area of Science:
- Plastic surgery
- Biomaterials science
- Oromaxillofacial prosthetics
Background:
- Total nasal defects significantly impact patient quality of life.
- Maxillofacial prostheses provide a viable solution for tissue restoration.
- Addressing social and psychological challenges associated with nasal defects is crucial.
Observation:
- Two clinical cases of total nasal defect reconstruction using maxillofacial prostheses were analyzed.
- The study evaluated the application of magnetic and adhesive retention methods.
- Clinical and technological steps for prosthesis fabrication were documented.
Findings:
- Maxillofacial prostheses effectively restore missing nasal tissues and improve patient aesthetics.
- Both magnetic and adhesive retention techniques demonstrated utility in different clinical scenarios.
- A modified impression technique was introduced to enhance the manufacturing process.
Implications:
- Maxillofacial prosthetics offer a significant improvement in patient quality of life following nasal reconstruction.
- The study highlights the versatility of retention methods in prosthetic design.
- The presented fabrication steps and modified impression technique can aid clinicians in managing nasal defects.
Keywords:
facial impressionfacial prosthesismaxillofacial prosthesesnasal prosthesistotal nasal defect
