Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2025
Computer-Aided Three-Dimensional Visualization in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Thyroid Cancer
Published on: June 9, 2023
Molecular Testing Has Limited Utility in the Surgical Evaluation of Bethesda III Thyroid Nodules
William H Scola1, Samantha M Linhares1, Rachel S Handelsman1
1Division of Endocrine Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department of Surgery, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL.
Background:
The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology has 6 diagnostic categories, each with an implied cancer risk of malignancy (ROM). Bethesda III, defined as atypia or follicular lesions of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) on fine needle aspiration (FNA), has an indeterminate ROM. This study investigates the utility of Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) and Thyroid Sequencing (ThyroSeq) molecular testing to predict malignancy in AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules.
Methods:
A retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 1457 patients with index thyroid nodules who underwent FNA and thyroidectomy at a single academic institution was performed. Use of GEC or ThyroSeq for AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules was examined. GEC testing was reported benign or suspicious for malignancy whereas ThyroSeq testing was reported on a spectrum of low, intermediate or high ROM. Descriptive statistics were utilized to compare the ROM among AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules.
Results:
Of 1457 patients with FNA thyroid cytology, 359 (25%) corresponded to AUS/FLUS results. There were 132 (37%) patients with GEC testing and 88 (24%) had ThyroSeq testing. ROM without GEC or ThyroSeq testing was 49%, whereas ROM with suspicious GEC was 55%. ROM with positive ThyroSeq was 73%. Among ThyroSeq patients, 43 had intermediate-risk mutations with 60% malignancy, and 23 had high-risk mutations with 96% malignancy (P < 0.01).
Conclusion:
Surgical patients with AUS/FLUS thyroid nodules have a high ROM. High-risk ThyroSeq testing may have some utility in predicting malignancy, but GEC and intermediate-risk TGC results have limited value. Surgeons should carefully consider the utility of molecular tests to determine surgical resection.
