Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

What are Populations and Communities?

What are Populations and Communities?

Natural Selection and Mating Preferences

Natural Selection and Mating Preferences

The principle of natural selection posits that organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This principle is closely intertwined with mating preferences, a key aspect of sexual selection, which evolutionary psychologists believe is driven by instincts to propagate one's genes. Such instincts significantly influence mating behaviors and preferences between genders.
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing,...

Gene Flow

Gene Flow

Gene flow is the transfer of genes among populations, resulting from either the dispersal of gametes or from the migration of individuals.

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective

In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...

Relationship Formation

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...

Frequency-dependent Selection

Frequency-dependent Selection

When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Effects of storage conditions on oxidative stress biomarkers: methodological implications for ecological and evolutionary studies.

The Journal of experimental biology·2026

Same author

Does a Father's Social Environment Influence Their Sons' Sperm Sex Ratio? Potential for the Epigenetic Transmission of a Sex-Allocating Mechanism.

Ecology and evolution·2025

Same author

Agent-based modelling reveals feedback loops and non-linearity between mating system evolution and disease dynamics.

PloS one·2025

Same author

Temperature can reverse sexual conflict, facilitating population growth.

Evolution letters·2025

Same author

Sexual selection and population spatial structure interact to shape sex-specific evolutionary responses in physiology.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2025

Same author

Silent cells? Potential for context-dependent gene expression in mature sperm.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Induction and Evaluation of Inbreeding Crosses Using the Ant, Vollenhovia Emeryi

Induction and Evaluation of Inbreeding Crosses Using the Ant, Vollenhovia Emeryi

Published on: October 5, 2018

Metapopulation structure modulates sexual antagonism.

E Rodriguez-Exposito^1,2, F Garcia-Gonzalez^1,3

¹Doñana Biological Station (EBD-CSIC) Isla de la Cartuja Sevilla Spain.

Evolution Letters

|August 9, 2021

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Metapopulation structure impacts sexual conflict evolution. In seed beetles, spatial structure reversed typical patterns, reducing female resistance to male harm in polygamous populations.

Keywords:

Callosobruchus maculatus ecological context evolutionary ecology experimental evolution female resistance to male harm metapopulation structure population subdivision sexual conflict sexual selection sexually antagonistic coevolution

More Related Videos

Visually Sexing Loggerhead Shrike Lanius Ludovicianus Using Plumage Coloration and Pattern

Visually Sexing Loggerhead Shrike Lanius Ludovicianus Using Plumage Coloration and Pattern

Published on: March 8, 2020

Sexual Crosses with the Mucoromycete Phycomyces blakesleeanus

Sexual Crosses with the Mucoromycete Phycomyces blakesleeanus

Published on: June 6, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Induction and Evaluation of Inbreeding Crosses Using the Ant, Vollenhovia Emeryi

Induction and Evaluation of Inbreeding Crosses Using the Ant, Vollenhovia Emeryi

Published on: October 5, 2018

Visually Sexing Loggerhead Shrike Lanius Ludovicianus Using Plumage Coloration and Pattern

Visually Sexing Loggerhead Shrike Lanius Ludovicianus Using Plumage Coloration and Pattern

Published on: March 8, 2020

Sexual Crosses with the Mucoromycete Phycomyces blakesleeanus

Sexual Crosses with the Mucoromycete Phycomyces blakesleeanus

Published on: June 6, 2025

Area of Science:

Evolutionary biology
Ecology
Behavioral ecology

Background:

Sexual conflict arises from differing reproductive interests between sexes.
Metapopulation structure, defined by interconnected subpopulations, is common in nature.
The interplay between mating systems and metapopulation dynamics on sexual conflict remains poorly understood.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate how mating systems (monogamy vs. polygamy) and metapopulation structure influence sexual conflict evolution.
To assess the independent and combined effects of these factors on sexually antagonistic coevolution.
To determine if metapopulation structure modifies established sexual conflict dynamics.

Main Methods:

Experimental evolution using the seed beetle (Callosobruchus maculatus) as a model system.
Manipulating selection histories related to mating systems (monogamy/polygamy).
Implementing population subdivision and migration (metapopulation structure).

Main Results:

Females from polygamous populations showed greater resistance to male harm, aligning with sexual conflict theory.
Metapopulation structure significantly altered sexual conflict dynamics, reversing the expected pattern.
Females in structured, polygamous populations exhibited reduced resistance to male harm compared to unstructured ones.

Conclusions:

Population spatial structure, specifically metapopulation dynamics, plays a crucial role in moderating sexual selection and conflict.
The evolution of sexual conflict is context-dependent and influenced by ecological factors like population structure.
Findings have implications for understanding population dynamics, conservation, and biological control strategies.