Effect of Low Lactose Formula on the Short-Term Outcomes of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Mahdi Alsaleem1,2, Jarrod Dusin2, Gangaram Akangire2,3,4

  • 1University of Kansas Medical Center, Wichita, KS, USA.

Insights

Low lactose formula (LLF) offers no proven benefits for infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). This systematic review found no improvements in length of stay, treatment duration, or growth compared to standard formula.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal Medicine
  • Clinical Nutrition
  • Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

  • Increasing use of low lactose formula (LLF) for infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS).
  • Limited clinical evidence supports the efficacy of LLF in this population.
  • Need for a systematic review to evaluate current literature.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review the existing literature on the use of LLF in infants diagnosed with NAS.
  • To assess the clinical evidence regarding the benefits and outcomes associated with LLF feeding in NAS infants.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library (2015-2020).
  • Inclusion of randomized controlled trials, prospective, and retrospective studies.
  • Risk of bias assessment and certainty of evidence evaluation using GRADE criteria.

Main Results:

  • Four studies (1 RCT, 2 retrospective, 1 quality improvement) met inclusion criteria.
  • Meta-analysis was not feasible due to study heterogeneity.
  • No significant benefits of LLF were observed for short-term outcomes, including length of hospital stay, duration of pharmacological therapy, and infant growth.

Conclusions:

  • Current evidence suggests LLF provides no discernible advantages over standard formula for infants with NAS.
  • The certainty of the evidence supporting these findings is low.
  • Further high-quality research is needed to definitively establish the role of LLF in NAS management.