Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2025

Creating Virtual-hand and Virtual-face Illusions to Investigate Self-representation
Published on: March 1, 2017
Did You Just Lie to Me? Deception Detection in Face to Face versus Computer Mediated Communication
Michelle Eskritt1, Brandon Fraser1, Sandra Bosacki2
1Department of Psychology, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Canada.
None:
Individuals' deception detection ability during either a face-to-face (FtF) interaction or through computer-mediated communication (CMC) was explored under more naturalistic conditions where they were not forewarned that deception may be involved. Participants discussed a social issue either in a room together or by instant messaging from separate rooms. Prior to discussion, some participants were asked to deceive their partner regarding their actual opinion on the issue. Results showed that mode of communication did not influence participants' deception detection accuracy rate, nor their truth bias. Regardless of mode of communication, deceptive participants experienced the same level of physiological arousal as the non-deceivers. In contrast, deceivers reported experiencing higher levels of anxiety but only in the FtF condition. Findings highlight how for different communication modalities, a multitude of interactive factors may influence deception detection.
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification
Facial Feedback Hypothesis
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring

