Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2025

A Familiarization Protocol Facilitates the Participation of Children with ASD in Electrophysiological Research
Published on: July 31, 2017
Clinical outcomes and associated predictors of early intervention in autism spectrum disorder: a study protocol
Anne Masi1, Cheryl Dissanayake2, Tasha Alach3
1School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Insights
This study identifies factors predicting outcomes in early intensive intervention (EII) for children with autism spectrum disorder. Understanding these predictors can help tailor EII for better results in children with autism.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Early intervention is crucial for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), with earlier access to early intensive intervention (EII) programs linked to better outcomes.
- However, significant variability exists in children's responses to EII, even when they receive similar programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess predictors of outcomes in EII for children with ASD.
- To examine child and family characteristics at program entry that influence intervention success.
- To explore the mediating role of family and psychosocial factors in EII outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, multisite cohort study with a pre-post design was conducted across six Autism Specific Early Learning and Care Centres (ASELCCs) in Australia.
- Data on child symptoms, cognitive and developmental skills, adaptive function, behaviors, parental stress, quality of life, and family characteristics were collected at entry and exit.
- Predictors of change in scores from baseline to exit (approximately 12 months later) were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Analysis focused on identifying child and family characteristics at entry that predict outcomes at exit following EII.
- The study investigated the mediating influence of family and psychosocial factors on intervention effectiveness.
- Primary outcome of interest was the change in scores from baseline to exit.
Conclusions:
- Identifying predictors of EII outcomes is essential for optimizing intervention strategies for children with ASD.
- Understanding variability in response can lead to more personalized and effective early intervention approaches.
- This research aims to inform clinical practice and improve outcomes for children with autism spectrum disorder.
Introduction:
Research highlights the importance of early intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder with better outcomes associated with earlier access to early intensive intervention (EII) programmes. However, there is significant variability in response to EII despite children receiving the same programmes.
Methods And Analysis:
A prospective, multisite cohort study using a pre-post design assesses the predictors of early intervention outcomes for children who receive EII through six early intervention services (Autism Specific Early Learning and Care Centres, ASELCCs) across Australia. Child and family characteristics at entry to and exit from ASELCCs are ascertained using measures of autism symptoms (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2; Social Communication Questionnaire); cognitive, language and developmental skills (Mullen Scale of Early Learning); adaptive function (Vineland Adaptive Behaviour Scale-second Edition); behaviours (Child Behaviour Checklist-1.5 to 5 years; Restricted Repetitive Behaviour Scale); parental stress (Parent Stress Index-4 Short Form); quality of life (Quality of Life in Autism Scale) and a semistructured family history questionnaire for sociodemographic, family and psychosocial characteristics. Characteristics at entry are used as predictors of outcome at exit following EII approximately 12 months later. The change in score from baseline to exit will be the primary outcome of interest. The mediating role of family and psychosocial factors will also be considered.
Ethics Approval:
University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (HC14267).
Dissemination Of Results:
Findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences. A report summarising data and the interpretation of data will be published.
More Related Videos
11:14A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants
Published on: October 4, 2015
05:04An Electrophysiology Protocol to Measure Reward Anticipation and Processing in Children
Published on: October 4, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...