Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 24, 2025

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
Published on: September 7, 2019
Systematic Investigation of Error Distribution in Machine Learning Algorithms Applied to the Quantum-Chemistry QM9
Luis Cesar de Azevedo1, Gabriel A Pinheiro2, Marcos G Quiles2
1Center of Mathematics, Computation and Cognition, Federal University of ABC, Av. dos Estados, 5001, 09210-580 Santo André, SP, Brazil.
Abstract:
Most machine learning applications in quantum-chemistry (QC) data sets rely on a single statistical error parameter such as the mean square error (MSE) to evaluate their performance. However, this approach has limitations or can even yield incorrect interpretations. Here, we report a systematic investigation of the two components of the MSE, i.e., the bias and variance, using the QM9 data set. To this end, we experiment with three descriptors, namely (i) symmetry functions (SF, with two-body and three-body functions), (ii) many-body tensor representation (MBTR, with two- and three-body terms), and (iii) smooth overlap of atomic positions (SOAP), to evaluate the prediction process's performance using different numbers of molecules in training samples and the effect of bias and variance on the final MSE. Overall, low sample sizes are related to higher MSE. Moreover, the bias component strongly influences the larger MSEs. Furthermore, there is little agreement among molecules with higher errors (outliers) across different descriptors. However, there is a high prevalence among the outliers intersection set and the convex hull volume of geometric coordinates (VCH). According to the obtained results with the distribution of MSE (and its components bias and variance) and the appearance of outliers, it is suggested to use ensembles of models with a low bias to minimize the MSE, more specifically when using a small number of molecules in the training set.
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Random and Systematic Errors
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Random Error
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

