Simultaneous Topography-Guided PRK/CXL Versus Topography-Assisted PTK/CXL: 1-Year Prospective Outcomes in Keratoconic...

To compare 1-year visual and tomographic outcomes of topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (TGPRK) and topography-assisted phototherapeutic keratectomy (TPTK) with corneal cross-linking (CXL).

TGPRK and TPTK were performed in 72 eyes (68 patients) and 74 eyes (71 patients), respectively. Based on the TGPRK ablation plan, the eyes underwent TPTK where the theoretical minimum corneal thickness (MCT) after surgery was less than 400 µm. In the TGPRK group, the theoretical maximum ablation depth was 50 µm after epithelium removal. In TPTK, a decentered single-step PTK was performed only in the steepest anterior curvature zone and the stromal ablation depth was limited to 25 µm. After ablation, accelerated CXL was performed in the central 8-mm zone (9 mW/cm² for 10 minutes in "epithelium-off" mode) in both TGPRK and TPTK. The visual acuity and tomography were assessed.

Improvement in uncorrected (P = .73) and corrected (P = .66) distance visual acuity was similar between the two groups. However, TGPRK eyes had a greater decrease in keratometry, anterior defocus, and spherical aberration (P < .001) at the cost of greater ablation of tissue (P < .001). The median MCT decreased by 27 and 52.5 µm in the TPTK and TGPRK eyes, respectively. Both groups had similar decreases in anterior root mean square of lower (P = .10) and higher (P = .12) order aberrations.

Both TGPRK and TPTK improved visual acuity in the keratoconic eyes at 1 year of follow-up. However, TPTK removed less volume of tissue. Further, it could be an alternative to TGPRK if the theoretical stromal ablation exceeds 50 µm in thin keratoconic corneas. [.