Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback01:24

Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback

30
Self-esteem is intricately tied to our perception of competence and our ability to exert control over our lives. One of the primary sources of this perception is performance feedback — the ongoing evaluation of our actions in terms of success and failure. According to Franks and Marolla (1976), people derive self-worth from experiencing themselves as causal agents, capable of achieving goals and overcoming obstacles. This process nurtures a critical component of self-esteem:...
30
Protecting Self-Esteem01:27

Protecting Self-Esteem

43
Self-esteem, a central component of psychological well-being, is actively maintained through various cognitive and behavioral strategies. Individuals employ specific mechanisms to preserve a positive self-concept and mitigate threats to their self-worth, particularly in contexts involving social evaluation or personal feedback. Four primary techniques are commonly used to sustain self-esteem.Manipulating AppraisalsOne prominent strategy involves manipulating appraisals from others. Individuals...
43
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

41
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
41
Theories of Dissolution: Diffusion Layer Model01:15

Theories of Dissolution: Diffusion Layer Model

1.1K
Dissolution, the process by which drug particles dissolve in a solvent, is explained by the diffusion layer model, a theoretical framework that simulates the absorption of oral drugs and allows us to analyze experimental data.
This process starts with a thin layer, saturated with the drug, forming at the interface between the solid and liquid. The solute then diffuses from this layer into the main solution. The Noyes-Whitney equation suggests that the rate of dissolution relies on the diffusion...
1.1K
Ecological Succession02:17

Ecological Succession

19.8K
Ecological succession is influenced by the processes of facilitation, inhibition, and toleration. Facilitation occurs when early successional species create more favorable ecological conditions for subsequent species, such as enhanced nutrient, water, or light availability. In contrast, inhibition happens when early successional species create unfavorable ecological conditions for potential successive species, such as limiting resource availability. In some cases, later successional species...
19.8K
Relationship Growth01:27

Relationship Growth

42
Interpersonal relationships progress through stages, beginning with awareness and moving toward mutuality, where emotional connections deepen. While many relationships remain at moderate levels of mutuality, deeper connections form through self-disclosure, trust, and interdependence.Self-DisclosureSelf-disclosure involves revealing personal information, starting with surface-level details and gradually progressing to more intimate content. As trust grows, individuals feel more comfortable...
42

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Climate futures require politics.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

The reliability of replications: a study in computational reproductions.

Royal Society open science·2025
Same author

Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022
Same author

Explaining the homogeneous diffusion of COVID-19 nonpharmaceutical interventions across heterogeneous countries.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2020
Same author

Institutionalising electoral uncertainty and authoritarian regime survival.

European journal of political research·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 24, 2025

Strategies for Tracking Anastasis, A Cell Survival Phenomenon that Reverses Apoptosis
12:55

Strategies for Tracking Anastasis, A Cell Survival Phenomenon that Reverses Apoptosis

Published on: February 16, 2015

18.2K

How democracies prevail: democratic resilience as a two-stage process.

Vanessa A Boese1, Amanda B Edgell1,2, Sebastian Hellmeier1,3

  • 1V-Dem Institute, Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Democratization
|August 16, 2021
PubMed
Summary

Democratic resilience, a two-stage process, has weakened significantly since the Cold War. While strong institutions aid resilience, economic development only helps prevent initial declines, not subsequent breakdowns.

Keywords:
Democratic resilienceautocratizationdemocratic breakdowndemocratic survivaljudicial constraints

More Related Videos

Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications
07:37

Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications

Published on: January 19, 2018

19.1K
The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

38.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 24, 2025

Strategies for Tracking Anastasis, A Cell Survival Phenomenon that Reverses Apoptosis
12:55

Strategies for Tracking Anastasis, A Cell Survival Phenomenon that Reverses Apoptosis

Published on: February 16, 2015

18.2K
Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications
07:37

Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications

Published on: January 19, 2018

19.1K
The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

38.7K

Area of Science:

  • Political Science
  • Comparative Politics
  • Democratization Studies

Background:

  • Democratic resilience is crucial for understanding regime stability in the face of autocratization.
  • The post-Cold War era has witnessed a concerning trend of democratic decline and regime breakdown.
  • Existing literature often overlooks the multi-stage nature of democratic resilience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce a novel conceptualization of democratic resilience as a two-stage process: avoiding decline and averting breakdown.
  • To analyze the trends in democratic resilience since 1900, with a focus on the post-Cold War period.
  • To identify factors associated with each stage of democratic resilience.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the Episodes of Regime Transformation (ERT) dataset, covering the period since 1900.
  • Employed quantitative analysis to track episodes of democratic decline and regime breakdown.
  • Conducted regression analysis to identify correlates of democratic resilience at different stages.

Main Results:

  • Democracies exhibited high resilience to the onset of autocratization from 1900 until the end of the Cold War.
  • Democratic resilience has substantially weakened since 1993, with 59 episodes of decline and 36 regime breakdowns.
  • Once autocratization begins, only 20% of democracies avert breakdown; strong judicial constraints and past institutional strength are key resilience factors.
  • Economic development is linked to resilience against the onset of autocratization but not against breakdown once it has begun.

Conclusions:

  • Democratic resilience is a complex, multi-stage phenomenon that has significantly eroded in recent decades.
  • Strong institutional factors, particularly judicial constraints and historical institutional strength, are vital for maintaining democratic resilience.
  • The findings challenge the universal role of economic development in bolstering democratic resilience against breakdown.