[Study on the assignment method of intensity modulated radiotherapy plan for nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on MR...

Objective: To discuss the influence of different computed tomography (CT) value assignment methods on dose calculation of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan which designed for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and the value assignment methods of IMRT plan for NPC based on magnetic resonance (MR) images. Methods: Simulation CT and MR image of 32 NPC patients in Shandong Cancer Hospital from March 2018 to November 2018 were selected for this study. Populate CT values were obtained by contouring and analyzing the simulation CT of patients' tissue, including bone, air, brain, eyeball, optic-nerve, lens, parotid, masseter, skin. Pseudo-CT were generated by different CT value assignment methods: CT1: CT value of all tissues was set to 0HU; CT2: CT value of air cavity was set to populate CT value based on CT1; CT3: CT value of Bone was set to populate CT value based on CT2; CT4: CT value of each soft tissue were set to populate CT value based on CT3. The IMRT plan for NPC as Plan0 was designed base on simulation CT. Then Plan0 was transplanted to four pseudo-CT to recalculate the dose and obtain Plan1, Plan2, Plan3 and Plan4, the differences of dosimetric parameters were compared with Plan0. NPC-IMRT plan was designed base on MR images by using the assignment method with CT value of each tissue were set to populate CT value. Results: In the head and neck CT images, the average populate CT values of bone and cavity were 621 HU and -720 HU, respectively. The populate CT values of other soft tissue ranges from -20 HU to 70 HU. The differences of dosimetric indexes of Plan1, Plan2, Plan3, Plan4 decreased sequentially compare to Plan0, the difference of the dosimetry parameters of Plan4 and Plan0 was the smallest. The differences of PTV D(99), PTV D(95), isocenter dose, D(mean) of all tissues, D(max) of bilateral eye balls, D(max) of bilateral lens, D(max) of bilateral optic nerves, D(mean) of bilateral parotid, V(20) of bilateral parotid, D(50) of bilateral parotid, D(max) of spinal cord, D(max) of brainstem, D(5) of brainstem between Plan4 and Plan0 were all less than 1%. The difference of V(30) in bilateral parotid between Plan4 and Plan0 was less than 1.5%. In the comparison of the pixel dose distribution, the regions of dose distribution difference greater than 1% mainly distributed in the air cavity, bone periphery and the skin. The target area of the IMRT plan for NPC based on MR images met 95% of the prescribed dose, and the dose of each organ at risk was within the dose limit. Conclusions: The assignment method of each tissue and organs set to populate CT value compared with other methods has the least influence on the dose calculation of NPC-IMRT plan, which could meet the clinical requirements. Therefore, it should be the first choice of assignment method when designing NPC-IMRT plan based on MR image.