Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

An Immunohistopathologic Study to Profile the Folate Receptor Beta Macrophage and Vascular Immune Microenvironment in Giant Cell Arteritis
Published on: February 8, 2019
The Cost-Effectiveness of Tocilizumab (Actemra) Therapy in Giant Cell Arteritis
Arjun V Jogimahanti1, Ashwini T Kini, Lauren E Irwin
1University of Texas Medical School at Houston (AVJ), Houston, Texas; Department of Ophthalmology (AK), Blanton Eye Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas; Houston Methodist Hospital (LI), Houston, Texas; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (AGL), University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas; Department of Ophthalmology (AGL), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Departments of Ophthalmology, Neurology, and Neurosurgery (AGL), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Section of Ophthalmology (AGL), University of Texas Maryland Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; and Department of Ophthalmology (AGL), the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Background:
Tocilizumab (Actemra) is a humanized anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody that has been used as a steroid-sparing agent in giant cell arteritis (GCA). Although the clinical effects are well described in GCA, the cost-effectiveness of the use of tocilizumab in GCA is ill defined. The purpose of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of tocilizumab in GCA compared with prednisone alone.
Methods:
A retrospective study of 32 patients with biopsy-proven GCA comparing prednisone alone (16 patients) and prednisone with tocilizumab (16 patients) was performed. The cost for tocilizumab therapy for 26 weeks with mild and severe side effects (Groups 1 and 2, respectively) and for 52 weeks with mild and severe side effects (Group 3 and 4, respectively) was compared with estimated costs of mild and severe steroid-induced side effects (Groups 5 and 6, respectively). Statistical analysis between groups was conducted using independent sample t tests.
Results:
Three out of the 4 group combinations of tocilizumab with prednisone demonstrated a statistically significant (P < 0.05) difference in cost compared with prednisone alone for GCA. Group 2 (26-week tocilizumab therapy with severe steroid-induced side effects), with no statically significant difference in price when compared with steroid therapy alone and far fewer side effects, demonstrated the potential use of tocilizumab in GCA therapy. As expected, longer treatment duration with tocilizumab was associated with greater cost. With respect to side effect severity, the number of side effects of steroid therapy was inversely associated with difference in cost between tocilizumab therapy and steroid side effect treatment.
Conclusion:
This study demonstrates that combination therapy of tocilizumab and prednisone is significantly more expensive than steroids alone with or without accounting for the cost of steroid-induced side effects in treated GCA. The difference in cost between the 2 therapy types is directly related to tocilizumab therapy duration and inversely related to the number or severity of steroid side effects. Patients with GCA who require a shorter duration of steroid therapy and are at risk for a high number of side effects from steroid use may be potential candidates for tocilizumab therapy, from an economic perspective.
More Related Videos
09:34Dynamic Imaging of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells with [18F]Tetrafluoroborate Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography
Published on: February 17, 2022
04:50Preliminary Study on Acupuncture Combined with Grain-sized Moxibustion for Treating Rheumatoid Arthritis with Finger Joint Pain
Published on: May 16, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Glucocorticoids
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Pericarditis III: Medical Management
Atherosclerosis III: Management