Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

1.4K
The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
1.4K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis01:24

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching I: Assessment and Diagnosis

2.0K
The nursing process provides a clinical decision-making framework for patients and families to establish and implement a personalized care plan. Since part of the nurse's duties is to teach patients, the steps of the nursing process are the most effective way to approach instruction. The nursing process and the teaching-learning process are inextricably linked.
It is critical to determine the patient's learning needs during the assessment. Determination of learning needs compounds data...
2.0K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

5.2K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
5.2K
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring01:25

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

1.0K
Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...
1.0K
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

3.7K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
3.7K
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

661
The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
661

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Technology and Innovation in Care Transitions: Imagining the Future of Postdischarge Care.

The Medical clinics of North America·2026
Same author

Frequent Ambulatory Care Visits Predict Harmful Diagnostic Errors in High-Risk Hospitalized Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same author

The association between sepsis and diagnostic errors: A secondary analysis of the Utility of Predictive Systems for Diagnostic Error study.

Journal of hospital medicine·2026
Same author

Validation of a Large Language Model Enhanced Frailty Index.

Journal of medical systems·2026
Same author

Evaluating the integration of a COVID-19 symptom checker into an asthma-focused mHealth application.

Healthcare (Amsterdam, Netherlands)·2025
Same author

Can ChatGPT Identify Diagnostic Uncertainty Upon Admission?

Journal of general internal medicine·2025
Same journal

Intraloop neoangiogenesis in an AI-classified scleroderma pattern: recognizing a morphological clue to suspected dermatomyositis.

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2026
Same journal

Lessons in clinical reasoning: a case of a boy who continued crying after falling.

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of emergency physicians' probability estimates for acute coronary syndrome.

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2026
Same journal

Interfering factors in the normative diagnostic approach.

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2026
Same journal

Using generative AI to support clinical reasoning coaching: a theory-informed approach.

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2026
Same journal

Learning from what went right: a Safety-II application of the SIDER protocol to a case of occult breast cancer.

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
09:52

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

Published on: January 15, 2017

17.4K

Analyzing diagnostic errors in the acute setting: a process-driven approach.

Jacqueline A Griffin1, Kevin Carr2, Kerrin Bersani2

  • 1Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.

Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany)
|August 22, 2021
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Analyzing diagnostic errors in hospitalized patients revealed frequent failures, particularly in information handling and initial assessments. This systematic approach using the modified DEER taxonomy aids in preventing adverse events.

Keywords:
DEER taxonomyacute carediagnostic error

More Related Videos

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
04:19

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis

Published on: May 10, 2022

4.1K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
09:52

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide

Published on: January 15, 2017

17.4K
A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis
04:19

A Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Eating Disorder Analysis and Diagnosis

Published on: May 10, 2022

4.1K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.9K

Area of Science:

  • Medical error analysis
  • Diagnostic process improvement
  • Patient safety research

Background:

  • Diagnostic errors contribute to adverse events in hospitalized patients.
  • Understanding failure points in the diagnostic process is crucial for prevention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically analyze failures in the diagnostic process within a cohort of general medicine patients who experienced medical error.
  • To identify frequent and significant failure points to inform preventative strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Two clinicians independently reviewed sampled medical records of deceased patients with medical error.
  • The Safer Dx instrument and a modified Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research (DEER) taxonomy (revised for acute care) were used to identify failure points (FPs) and significant FPs.

Main Results:

  • 13 out of 16 sampled cases (81.3%) had diagnostic errors, with 113 FPs and 30 significant FPs identified.
  • Most significant FPs (63.3%) occurred in 'Diagnostic Information and Patient Follow-up' and 'Patient and Provider Encounter and Initial Assessment' dimensions.
  • 14 out of 16 cases (87.5%) had a significant FP in these key dimensions.

Conclusions:

  • Diagnostic process failures are multi-dimensional and common in this patient cohort.
  • The modified DEER taxonomy provides critical insights into diagnostic failures, highlighting targets for intervention to prevent adverse events.