Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Quantification and Whole Genome Characterization of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Wastewater and Air Samples
Published on: June 30, 2023
A warning about measurement and methodological issues associated with coronavirus tracking and evaluation across
Robert Ladouceur1, Howard Shaffer2, Paige Shaffer3
1École de Psychologie, Université Laval, Laval, QC.
Abstract:
As people around the world experience a devastating pandemic, it is critical that policy-makers consider the methodological and measurement issues that might be associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health indicators. This commentary uses four primary variables to illustrate measurement and methodological issues that can complicate comparisons between jurisdictions. Jurisdiction refers to a variety of geographic areas, such as a country, a state, or a province/territory. These variables play a critical role in determining how we understand the trajectory of disease spread. These variables also contribute to our understanding of prevention strategies and their associated efficacy, reflecting the impact of COVID-19 on hospitals. It is critical for public health stakeholders and the public to recognize that these four simple variables can vary substantially across jurisdictions.
Related Concept Videos
Principles of Disease Surveillance
Steps in Outbreak Investigation
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Introduction to Epidemiology
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

