Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
Published on: December 18, 2016
Anatomical Phase Extraction (APE) Method: A Novel Method to Correct Detrimental Effects of Tissue-Inhomogeneity in
Chien-Feng Judith Huang1,2, Win-Li Lin1,2, San-Chao Hwang3
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University College of Medicine and College of Engineering, Taipei 100233, Taiwan.
Purpose:
We present a novel background tissue phase removing method, called anatomical phase extraction (APE), and to investigate the accuracy of temperature estimation and capability of reducing background artifacts compared with the conventional referenceless methods.
Methods:
Susceptibility variance was acquired by subtracting pretreatment baseline images taken at different locations (nine pretreatment baselines are acquired and called φ 1 to φ 9). The susceptibility phase data φ was obtained using the Wiener deconvolution algorithm. The background phase data φ was isolated by subtracting φ from the whole phase data. Finally, φ was subtracted from the whole phase data before applying the referenceless method. As a proof of concept, the proposed APE method was performed on ex vivo pork tenderloin and compared with other two referenceless temperature estimation approaches, including reweighted ℓ1 referenceless (RW- ℓ1) and ℓ2 referenceless methods. The proposed APE method was performed with four different baselines combination, namely, (φ 1, φ 5, φ 2, φ 4), (φ 3, φ 5, φ 2, φ 6), (φ 7, φ 5, φ 8, φ 4), and (φ 9, φ 5, φ 8, φ 6), and called APE experiment 1 to 4, respectively. The multibaseline method was used as a standard reference. The mean absolute error (MAE) and two-sample t-test analysis in temperature estimation of three regions of interest (ROI) between the multibaseline method and the other three methods, i.e., APE, RW- ℓ1, and ℓ2, were calculated and compared.
Results:
Our results show that the mean temperature errors of the APE method-experiment 1, APE method-experiment 2, APE method-experiment 3, APE method-experiment 4, and RW- ℓ1 and ℓ2 referenceless method are 1.02°C, 1.04°C, 1.00°C, 1.00°C, 4.75°C, and 13.65°C, respectively. The MAEs of the RW- ℓ1 and ℓ2 referenceless methods were higher than that of APE method. The APE method showed no significant difference (p > 0.05), compared with the multibaseline method.
Conclusion:
The present work demonstrates the use of the APE method on referenceless MR thermometry to improve the accuracy of temperature estimation during MRI guided high-intensity focused ultrasound for ablation treatment.
More Related Videos
12:27Noninvasive In Vivo Small Animal MRI and MRS: Basic Experimental Procedures
Published on: October 20, 2009
09:21Human Brown Adipose Tissue Depots Automatically Segmented by Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Registered Magnetic Resonance Images
Published on: February 18, 2015