Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 23, 2025

Single-stage Dynamic Reanimation of the Smile in Irreversible Facial Paralysis by Free Functional Muscle Transfer
Published on: March 1, 2015
Neurotization Preferences in Smile Reanimation: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Joseph R Dusseldorp1, Matthew R Naunheim1, Olivia Quatela1
1From the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear and Harvard Medical School; and Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons and University of Sydney.
Most patients prefer cross-facial nerve grafting for smile reanimation over trigeminal nerve transfer, prioritizing a natural smile despite potential risks. This highlights the need for personalized treatment in facial paralysis.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Neurosurgery
- Decision Science
Background:
- Smile reanimation surgery aims to restore facial symmetry and function in patients with facial paralysis.
- Common donor nerve options include the ipsilateral trigeminal motor nerve and contralateral facial nerve branches.
- Patient preference for neurotization strategies is influenced by various factors, but their relative importance is unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess decision-making factors in smile reanimation surgery using a stated preference model.
- To determine the relative importance of different attributes influencing patient choice between trigeminal and cross-facial neurotization.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative interviews identified key attributes: smile type, number of operations, success rates, complication rates, and side effects.
- A discrete-choice experiment was conducted with 250 community volunteers evaluating simulated free muscle transfer scenarios.
- Hierarchical Bayes estimation modeled attribute importance based on participant choices.
Main Results:
- The chance of success (37.3%) was the most critical factor, followed by smile type (21.4%).
- Most participants (67.6%) preferred cross-facial neurotization over trigeminal neurotization, assuming an 80% success rate for cross-facial.
- Trigeminal neurotization was preferred when the cross-facial success rate dropped below 67%.
Conclusions:
- A majority of respondents favored cross-facial neurotization for smile reanimation, even with a higher perceived failure risk.
- Decision-making in smile reanimation is complex, involving a trade-off between different surgical outcomes and risks.
- Individualized assessment of risk tolerance is crucial for guiding treatment choices in facial reanimation.
More Related Videos
13:04Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023