Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 22, 2025

Myocardial Infarction by Percutaneous Embolization Coil Deployment in a Swine Model
Published on: November 4, 2021
Risk Factors for Recanalization after Coil Embolization
Karol Wiśniewski1, Zbigniew Tyfa2, Bartłomiej Tomasik3,4
1Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Medical University of Lodz, Kopcińskiego 22, 90-153 Lodz, Poland.
Abstract:
The aim of our study was to identify risk factors for recanalization 6 months after coil embolization using clinical data followed by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis.
Methods:
Firstly, clinical data of 184 patients treated with coil embolization were analyzed retrospectively. Secondly, aneurysm models for high/low recanalization risk were generated based on ROC curves and their cut-off points. Afterward, CFD was utilized to validate the results.
Results:
In multivariable analysis, aneurysm filling during the first embolization was an independent risk factor whilst packing density was a protective factor of recanalization after 6 months in patients with aSAH. For patients with unruptured aneurysms, packing density was found to be a protective factor whilst the aneurysm neck size was an independent risk factor. Complex flow pattern and multiple vortices were associated with aneurysm shape and were characteristic of the high recanalization risk group.
Conclusions:
Statistical analysis suggested that there are various factors influencing recanalization risk. Once certain values of morphometric parameters are exceeded, a complex flow with numerous vortices occurs. This phenomenon was revealed due to CFD investigations that validated our statistical research. Thus, the complex flow pattern itself can be treated as a relevant recanalization predictor.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management

