Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 22, 2025

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
Published on: July 14, 2015
Generalizable Compositional Features Influencing the Proteostatic Fates of Polar Low-Complexity Domains
Sean M Cascarina1, Joshua P Kaplan1, Mikaela R Elder1
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80525, USA.
Protein aggregation, linked to diseases, is managed by the proteostasis network. This study shows glycine-rich domains are degraded, while glutamine/asparagine-rich domains aggregate, revealing how protein sequences interact with cellular quality control.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Biochemistry
- Proteostasis Network Research
Background:
- Protein aggregation is implicated in numerous human diseases.
- The proteostasis network maintains protein health, including preventing aggregation.
- The mechanisms by which proteins aggregate despite proteostasis are not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if degradation sensitivities of model glycine (G)-rich and glutamine/asparagine (Q/N)-rich prion-like domains generalize to native domains.
- To explore how sequence features influence the interaction between intrinsically disordered domains and the ubiquitin-proteasome system.
Main Methods:
- Experimental analysis of native yeast G-rich and Q/N-rich domains in isolation.
- Bioinformatic analysis of G-rich domains from yeast and humans.
- Comparison of domain behavior in isolation versus native protein contexts.
Main Results:
- Native G-rich domains are sensitive to degradation triggered by hydrophobic residues.
- Native Q/N-rich domains resist degradation and tend to aggregate.
- Bioinformatic analysis shows G-rich domains avoid degradation-promoting features, suggesting selection by the proteostasis network.
- This sensitivity/resistance is not always maintained in native protein contexts, indicating evolved compensatory features.
Conclusions:
- The proteostasis network imposes constraints on the sequence space of G-rich domains.
- Q/N-rich domains exhibit intrinsic resistance to degradation, favoring aggregation.
- Proteins can evolve additional sequence features to modulate the degradation susceptibility of intrinsically disordered low-complexity domains (LCDs).
More Related Videos
06:50Author Spotlight: A Computational Approach to Decipher Amino Acid Preferences in Multispecific Protein-Protein Interactions
Published on: January 26, 2024
08:04A New Approach for the Comparative Analysis of Multiprotein Complexes Based on 15N Metabolic Labeling and Quantitative Mass Spectrometry
Published on: March 13, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Conservation of Protein Domains
Protein Folding
Globular Proteins
Globular proteins serve many important physiological functions, such as acting as enzymes, cellular messengers, and molecular transporters. These roles often require the proteins to be soluble in the aqueous...
Membrane Domains
Protein Domains
The membrane comprises a group of distinct proteins responsible for carrying out a cell's specific function. For example, the plasma membrane of the human sperm, or a single germ cell, contains a unique set of proteins in the...