Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 22, 2025
Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Orbital Fractures
Published on: May 16, 2025
Titanium Mesh versus Medpor Implant in Orbital Floor Reconstructions: A Comparative Study
Vishnu Gowtham Marella1, Rohit2, Prateek Khetrapal3
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Sai College of Dental Surgery, Vikarabad, Telangana, India.
Background:
Treating orbital injuries is interesting and difficult in the facial trauma. The balance in facial proportions and also the facial esthetics are required to achieve an anatomical harmony.
Objective:
To compare the functional results of individual reconstruction of orbital floor using either titanium mesh or Medpor in terms of various factors.
Materials And Methods:
There were two study groups including eight subjects with orbital floor fracture, namely A (Medpor) and B (titanium mesh). Various parameters were analyzed postoperatively at intervals of 1 week, 3 week, 6th week, and 3 months after the surgery.
Statistical Analysis:
Comparison of the different time points with respect to pain scores in the two study groups by Wilcoxon matched pairs test was done. P value was significant in the study Group A with P = 0.0431* and was insignificant in the study Group B with P = 0.1088.
Results:
All three cases of titanium mesh in orbital floor reconstruction had signs of infection, tenderness, and radiographic proof after 1 week in two subjects and 3 weeks in one patient. Pain was seen in all eight patients 1 week postoperatively.
Conclusion:
Although orbital reconstruction is a technique sensitive procedure both Medpore and Titanium mesh functions.
