Lack of Awareness of Reimbursement and Compensation Models Among Cardiothoracic Surgery Trainees

The objective of this study was to identify trainee knowledge gaps in reimbursement and compensation, determine the perceived importance of understanding these topics, and to explore if the Thoracic Surgery Curriculum needs additional educational material.

The Thoracic Surgical Residents Association Executive Committee selected the research proposal and distributed an anonymous electronic survey to 531 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education cardiothoracic surgery trainees. Standard descriptive statistics and regression analyses were performed.

One hundred fourteen responses were collected (response rate, 21.5%). Most trainees understood little to none about how attending surgeons are reimbursed (n = 74, 69%). Most trainees reported knowing little or nothing about pay-for-performance compensation (n = 73, 67%), bundled care (n = 82, 75%), or value-based reimbursement (n = 84, 77%). Approximately 20% of trainees were accurate in estimating surgeon reimbursement for 3 common cardiothoracic surgery procedures to within 20% of the true reimbursement value, whereas approximately 30% were accurate to within 50% of the true reimbursement value. No respondent characteristics were found to be associated with a more or less accurate reimbursement response. Additionally 81% of trainees (n = 87) responded that by the conclusion of training, understanding surgeon reimbursement is very important or extremely important and 90% of trainees (n = 95) either somewhat agreed or strongly agreed with including these topics in the Thoracic Surgical Curriculum.

Despite acknowledging the importance of understanding physician compensation and reimbursement, cardiothoracic surgery trainees do not understand how the current models work. This study exemplifies the need for a succinct curriculum in this domain for trainees nationwide.