Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 22, 2025

Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Published on: June 16, 2014
Effects of Spironolactone and Chlorthalidone on Cardiovascular Structure and Function in Chronic Kidney Disease: A
Nicola C Edwards1,2, Anna M Price1,3, Samir Mehta4
1Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Insights
Spironolactone did not significantly reduce left ventricular mass or arterial stiffness more than chlorthalidone in patients with early-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD). Hyperkalemia was more common with spironolactone.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Early-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased cardiovascular risk.
- Spironolactone has shown potential in reducing cardiovascular complications, but its specific effects on cardiac and vascular remodeling in CKD require further investigation.
- Previous studies suggest spironolactone may reduce left ventricular mass and arterial stiffness, but the mechanisms are not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of spironolactone versus chlorthalidone in reducing left ventricular mass and arterial stiffness in patients with nondiabetic stage 2 and 3 CKD.
- To evaluate the effects of spironolactone and chlorthalidone on blood pressure and renal function in this patient population.
- To assess the safety profiles of spironolactone and chlorthalidone, including the incidence of hyperkalemia and decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).
Main Methods:
- A prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point study was conducted in four UK centers.
- 154 participants with nondiabetic stage 2-3 CKD, on ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy with controlled BP, were randomized to receive either spironolactone 25 mg or chlorthalidone 25 mg daily for 40 weeks.
- Left ventricular mass by cardiac MRI, office and 24-hour ambulatory BP, pulse wave velocity, and eGFR were assessed.
Main Results:
- No significant difference was observed in left ventricular mass regression between spironolactone and chlorthalidone at 40 weeks (adjusted mean difference -3.8 g, P=0.08).
- Both drugs similarly reduced office and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and pulse wave velocity.
- Hyperkalemia (≥5.4 mEq/L) occurred significantly more frequently with spironolactone (12 vs. 2 participants, adjusted RR 5.5, P=0.02), but no severe hyperkalemia (≥6.5 mEq/L) was reported. A decline in eGFR >30% was more frequent with chlorthalidone (8 vs. 2 participants, adjusted RR 0.2, P=0.07).
Conclusions:
- Spironolactone was not superior to chlorthalidone in reducing left ventricular mass, blood pressure, or arterial stiffness in patients with nondiabetic CKD.
- Both agents demonstrated comparable efficacy in improving cardiovascular and hemodynamic parameters.
- Spironolactone was associated with a higher incidence of hyperkalemia, while chlorthalidone was associated with a trend towards more frequent declines in eGFR.
Background And Objectives:
In a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, treatment with spironolactone in early-stage CKD reduced left ventricular mass and arterial stiffness compared with placebo. It is not known if these effects were due to BP reduction or specific vascular and myocardial effects of spironolactone.
Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements:
A prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point study conducted in four UK centers (Birmingham, Cambridge, Edinburgh, and London) comparing spironolactone 25 mg to chlorthalidone 25 mg once daily for 40 weeks in 154 participants with nondiabetic stage 2 and 3 CKD (eGFR 30-89 ml/min per 1.73 m2). The primary end point was change in left ventricular mass on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Participants were on treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker and had controlled BP (target ≤130/80 mm Hg).
Results:
There was no significant difference in left ventricular mass regression; at week 40, the adjusted mean difference for spironolactone compared with chlorthalidone was -3.8 g (95% confidence interval, -8.1 to 0.5 g, P=0.08). Office and 24-hour ambulatory BPs fell in response to both drugs with no significant differences between treatment. Pulse wave velocity was not significantly different between groups; at week 40, the adjusted mean difference for spironolactone compared with chlorthalidone was 0.04 m/s (-0.4 m/s, 0.5 m/s, P=0.90). Hyperkalemia (defined ≥5.4 mEq/L) occurred more frequently with spironolactone (12 versus two participants, adjusted relative risk was 5.5, 95% confidence interval, 1.4 to 22.1, P=0.02), but there were no patients with severe hyperkalemia (defined ≥6.5 mEq/L). A decline in eGFR >30% occurred in eight participants treated with chlorthalidone compared with two participants with spironolactone (adjusted relative risk was 0.2, 95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 1.1, P=0.07).
Conclusions:
Spironolactone was not superior to chlorthalidone in reducing left ventricular mass, BP, or arterial stiffness in nondiabetic CKD.
More Related Videos
08:505/6th Nephrectomy in Combination with High Salt Diet and Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibition to Induce Chronic Kidney Disease in the Lewis Rat
Published on: July 3, 2013
08:21A Modified Two Kidney One Clip Mouse Model of Renin Regulation in Renal Artery Stenosis
Published on: October 26, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Antihypertensive Drugs: Thiazide-Class Diuretics
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction
Antihypertensive Drugs: Potassium-Sparing Diuretics