Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 22, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in iPSCs and Genetic Disease Research
Published on: October 20, 2023
Characterization and response to inflammatory stimulation of human endometrial-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells
Clarissa Leñero1, Annie C Bowles2, Diego Correa3
1Department of Orthopedics, UHealth Sports Medicine Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA; Diabetes Research Institute & Cell Transplant Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA; CryoVida Banco de Células Madre Adultas, Guadalajara, México.
Background Aims:
The human endometrium has emerged as an attractive source of endometrial-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (eMSCs) that can be easily isolated by non-invasive procedures. The prominent capacity of the endometrium for efficient and scarless regeneration each menstrual cycle indicates the increased eMSC immunomodulatory and pro-angiogenic properties. Herein the authors investigated the molecular responses of eMSCs to an inflammatory environment and whether those intrinsic responses affected their functional attributes.
Methods:
Human eMSCs immunophenotypic, transcriptional and secretory profiles were evaluated at passage three (P3) and passage eight (P8) to determine culture effects. Functionally, P3 and P8 non-induced and TNF-α/IFN-γ-induced eMSCs were interrogated for their capacity to suppress stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) proliferation, whereas non-induced eMSCs were assessed for their support to vascular network formation in co-cultures with human umbilical vein endothelial cells in vitro.
Results:
Non-induced P3 and P8 eMSCs exhibited similar spindle-shaped morphology and clonogenic capacity. Nevertheless, P8 eMSCs showed reduced growth rate capacity and telomere length. The eMSCs displayed the typical MSC-related immunophenotypic profile, with P3 and P8 eMSCs expressing high levels (>98%) of CD140β, intermediate levels (35-60%) of CD146 and SUSD2 and low levels (∼8%) of NG2 pericytic markers. Non-induced P3 and P8 showed similar transcriptional and secretory profiles, though the expression of immunomodulatory HLA-G and IL-8 genes was significantly downregulated in P8 compared with P3 eMSCs. Upon TNF-α/IFN-γ induction, eMSCs showed an immunophenotypic profile similar to that of non-induced eMSCs, except for significant upregulation of HLA-DR protein expression in both induced P3 and P8 eMSCs. However, induced P3 and P8 eMSCs showed significant upregulation of CD10, HLA-G, IDO, IL-6, IL-8, LIF and TSG gene expression compared with non-induced cultures. TNF-α/IFN-γ induction strongly increased the secretion of inflammatory-/angiogenesis-related molecules, whereas growth factor secretion was similar to the non-induced eMSCs. Functionally, P3 and P8 eMSCs showed a strong inhibitory effect on stimulated PBMC proliferation and the capacity to support neovascularization in vitro.
Conclusions:
The authors' study suggests that serial expansion does not affect eMSC immunophenotypic, transcriptional and secretory profiles. This is directly reflected by the functional immunomodulatory and pro-angiogenic properties of eMSCs, which remain unaltered until P8 in vitro. However, exposure of eMSCs to inflammatory environments enhances their immunomodulatory transcriptional and inflammatory-/angiogenesis-related secretory profiles. Therefore, the resulting evidence of eMSCs serial expansion and exposure to inflammation could serve as a foundation for improved eMSCs manufacturing and potential clinical translation efforts.

